PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OBTC vs. EVSM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OBTC vs. EVSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Osprey Bitcoin Trust (OBTC) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Municipal Income ETF (EVSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OBTC achieves a -32.48% return, which is significantly lower than EVSM's 1.35% return.


OBTC

1D
-1.11%
1M
-22.02%
YTD
-32.48%
6M
-32.20%
1Y
-39.69%
3Y*
42.23%
5Y*
5.99%
10Y*

EVSM

1D
0.00%
1M
0.60%
YTD
1.35%
6M
1.46%
1Y
3.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OBTC vs. EVSM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
OBTC
Osprey Bitcoin Trust
-32.48%-1.87%43.79%
EVSM
Eaton Vance Short Duration Municipal Income ETF
1.35%4.24%2.43%

Correlation

The correlation between OBTC and EVSM is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2024

0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OBTC vs. EVSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OBTC
OBTC Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
OBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
OBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
OBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
OBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

EVSM
EVSM Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
EVSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVSM Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
EVSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVSM Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OBTC vs. EVSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Osprey Bitcoin Trust (OBTC) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Municipal Income ETF (EVSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OBTCEVSMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

1.65

-0.78

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.81

3.60

-4.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.45

12.80

-14.25

OBTC vs. EVSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OBTC Sharpe Ratio is -0.89, which is lower than the EVSM Sharpe Ratio of 3.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OBTC and EVSM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OBTC vs. EVSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OBTC drawdown since its inception was -94.50%, which is greater than EVSM's maximum drawdown of -1.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OBTC and EVSM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OBTCEVSMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.50%

-1.50%

-93.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.13%

-1.07%

-48.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-66.28%

0.00%

-66.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.52%

-0.24%

-69.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.45%

0.30%

+27.15%

Volatility

OBTC vs. EVSM - Volatility Comparison

Osprey Bitcoin Trust (OBTC) has a higher volatility of 13.17% compared to Eaton Vance Short Duration Municipal Income ETF (EVSM) at 0.32%. This indicates that OBTC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OBTCEVSMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.17%

0.32%

+12.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.90%

0.84%

+34.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.83%

1.27%

+43.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.29%

1.91%

+55.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

76.82%

1.91%

+74.91%

OBTC vs. EVSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

OBTC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than EVSM's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

OBTC vs. EVSM - Dividend Comparison

OBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EVSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%.


PositionTTM20252024
EVSM
Eaton Vance Short Duration Municipal Income ETF
3.00%3.12%2.99%
OBTC
Osprey Bitcoin Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


OBTC and EVSM have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OBTC has higher volatility (13.17%) compared to EVSM (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OBTC dropped -94.50% vs EVSM's -1.50%.

On 1-year performance, EVSM leads with 3.85% vs -39.69% for OBTC. On fees, EVSM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, EVSM has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EVSM has performed better with a 3.85% return vs -39.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EVSM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for OBTC.

EVSM has the higher dividend yield at 3.00%, compared with 0.00% for OBTC.

OBTC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while EVSM is Municipal Bonds. OBTC tracks Bitcoin (BTC), while EVSM tracks ICE BofA 1-3 Year Municipal Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: Osprey Funds and Eaton Vance. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for OBTC and 0.19% for EVSM.

EVSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OBTC and EVSM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer