OBTC vs. BTCZ
OBTC (Osprey Bitcoin Trust) and BTCZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. OBTC is passively managed, while BTCZ is actively managed. Over the past year, OBTC returned -38.12% vs 85.62% for BTCZ. At a correlation of -0.93, they often move in opposite directions. OBTC charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BTCZ.
Performance
OBTC vs. BTCZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OBTC achieves a -25.85% return, which is significantly lower than BTCZ's 26.96% return.
OBTC
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- -2.35%
- 6M
- -33.28%
- YTD
- -25.85%
- 1Y
- -38.12%
- 3Y*
- 41.06%
- 5Y*
- 8.59%
- 10Y*
- —
BTCZ
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- 2.00%
- 6M
- 60.99%
- YTD
- 26.96%
- 1Y
- 85.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OBTC vs. BTCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
OBTC Osprey Bitcoin Trust | -25.85% | -1.87% | 59.44% |
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | 26.96% | -29.11% | -76.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between OBTC and BTCZ is -0.93, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2024 | -0.93 |
The correlation between OBTC and BTCZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.93 to -0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OBTC vs. BTCZ — Risk / Return Rank
OBTC
BTCZ
OBTC vs. BTCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Osprey Bitcoin Trust (OBTC) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OBTC | BTCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.20 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | 1.76 | -2.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.30 | 3.92 | -5.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OBTC vs. BTCZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OBTC drawdown since its inception was -94.50%, roughly equal to the maximum BTCZ drawdown of -91.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OBTC and BTCZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OBTC | BTCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.50% | -91.06% | -3.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.62% | -49.02% | -0.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.96% | -79.53% | +16.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.47% | -73.78% | +4.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.42% | 21.92% | +7.50% |
Volatility
OBTC vs. BTCZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Osprey Bitcoin Trust (OBTC) is 11.77%, while T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ) has a volatility of 23.70%. This indicates that OBTC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OBTC | BTCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.77% | 23.70% | -11.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.27% | 69.45% | -34.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.00% | 89.03% | -44.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.18% | 96.47% | -39.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 76.54% | 96.47% | -19.93% |
OBTC vs. BTCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
OBTC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCZ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
OBTC vs. BTCZ - Dividend Comparison
OBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.08% |
OBTC Osprey Bitcoin Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OBTC and BTCZ have a correlation of -0.93, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTCZ has higher volatility (23.70%) compared to OBTC (11.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OBTC dropped -94.50% vs BTCZ's -91.06%.
On 1-year performance, BTCZ leads with 85.62% vs -38.12% for OBTC. On fees, OBTC is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, OBTC has been the lower-risk option at 11.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BTCZ has performed better with a 85.62% return vs -38.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OBTC is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BTCZ.
BTCZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for OBTC.
They also come from different issuers: Osprey Funds and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for OBTC and 0.95% for BTCZ.
BTCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OBTC and BTCZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer