OBSOX vs. YAFFX
OBSOX (Oberweis Small-Cap Opportunities Fund) and YAFFX (AMG Yacktman Focused Fund) are both mutual funds - OBSOX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Oberweis, while YAFFX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by AMG. Over the past 10 years, OBSOX returned 18.39%/yr vs 12.96%/yr for YAFFX. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 1.25% expense ratio.
Performance
OBSOX vs. YAFFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OBSOX achieves a 34.50% return, which is significantly higher than YAFFX's 22.70% return. Over the past 10 years, OBSOX has outperformed YAFFX with an annualized return of 18.39%, while YAFFX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.96% annualized return.
OBSOX
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- -2.25%
- 6M
- 30.12%
- YTD
- 34.50%
- 1Y
- 51.16%
- 3Y*
- 21.56%
- 5Y*
- 16.10%
- 10Y*
- 18.39%
YAFFX
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -2.92%
- 6M
- 18.32%
- YTD
- 22.70%
- 1Y
- 37.90%
- 3Y*
- 17.91%
- 5Y*
- 11.16%
- 10Y*
- 12.96%
OBSOX vs. YAFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OBSOX Oberweis Small-Cap Opportunities Fund | 34.50% | 14.28% | 16.13% | 15.81% | -11.17% | 43.39% | 32.52% | 25.06% | -7.05% | 25.55% |
YAFFX AMG Yacktman Focused Fund | 22.70% | 23.70% | 0.63% | 16.53% | -8.20% | 16.48% | 17.22% | 19.21% | 2.99% | 20.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between OBSOX and YAFFX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 1997 | 0.64 |
Over the past year, the correlation between OBSOX and YAFFX has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OBSOX vs. YAFFX — Risk / Return Rank
OBSOX
YAFFX
OBSOX vs. YAFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oberweis Small-Cap Opportunities Fund (OBSOX) and AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OBSOX | YAFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.44 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.37 | 4.33 | +0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.32 | 12.13 | +3.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OBSOX vs. YAFFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OBSOX drawdown since its inception was -80.52%, which is greater than YAFFX's maximum drawdown of -43.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OBSOX and YAFFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OBSOX | YAFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.52% | -43.80% | -36.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.40% | -8.76% | -2.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.74% | -15.63% | -12.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.65% | -21.31% | -7.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.79% | -30.62% | -12.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.52% | -6.62% | +1.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.45% | -6.09% | -24.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.25% | 3.11% | +0.14% |
Volatility
OBSOX vs. YAFFX - Volatility Comparison
Oberweis Small-Cap Opportunities Fund (OBSOX) has a higher volatility of 9.79% compared to AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX) at 5.93%. This indicates that OBSOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YAFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OBSOX | YAFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.79% | 5.93% | +3.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.56% | 14.35% | +8.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.48% | 16.02% | +11.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.44% | 13.90% | +11.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.89% | 14.31% | +10.58% |
OBSOX vs. YAFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both OBSOX and YAFFX have an expense ratio of 1.25%.
Dividends
OBSOX vs. YAFFX - Dividend Comparison
OBSOX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while YAFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OBSOX Oberweis Small-Cap Opportunities Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.80% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 21.88% | 4.05% | 3.04% | 28.22% | 6.36% | 4.24% | 11.91% |
YAFFX AMG Yacktman Focused Fund | 15.12% | 18.55% | 10.20% | 4.42% | 7.60% | 4.70% | 11.87% | 15.84% | 22.15% | 11.82% | 11.81% | 24.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OBSOX and YAFFX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OBSOX has higher volatility (9.79%) compared to YAFFX (5.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OBSOX dropped -80.52% vs YAFFX's -43.80%.
YAFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OBSOX and YAFFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer