PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OBSOX vs. VRTGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OBSOX vs. VRTGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Oberweis Small-Cap Opportunities Fund (OBSOX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OBSOX achieves a 36.53% return, which is significantly higher than VRTGX's 18.46% return. Over the past 10 years, OBSOX has outperformed VRTGX with an annualized return of 19.01%, while VRTGX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.55% annualized return.


OBSOX

1D
2.92%
1M
8.39%
YTD
36.53%
6M
35.36%
1Y
60.95%
3Y*
24.06%
5Y*
17.06%
10Y*
19.01%

VRTGX

1D
0.86%
1M
5.85%
YTD
18.46%
6M
16.83%
1Y
39.45%
3Y*
18.76%
5Y*
6.15%
10Y*
11.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OBSOX vs. VRTGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OBSOX
Oberweis Small-Cap Opportunities Fund
36.53%14.28%16.13%15.81%-11.17%43.39%32.52%25.06%-7.05%25.55%
VRTGX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
18.46%12.97%15.26%18.80%-26.30%2.82%34.81%28.84%-9.21%22.27%

Correlation

The correlation between OBSOX and VRTGX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

0.93

The correlation between OBSOX and VRTGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OBSOX vs. VRTGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OBSOX
OBSOX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
OBSOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OBSOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
OBSOX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
OBSOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
OBSOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

VRTGX
VRTGX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
VRTGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OBSOX vs. VRTGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oberweis Small-Cap Opportunities Fund (OBSOX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OBSOXVRTGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.32

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.64

2.83

+2.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.82

10.20

+10.61

OBSOX vs. VRTGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OBSOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the VRTGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OBSOX and VRTGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OBSOXVRTGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

1.96

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.25

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.47

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.52

-0.18

Drawdowns

OBSOX vs. VRTGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OBSOX drawdown since its inception was -80.52%, which is greater than VRTGX's maximum drawdown of -41.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OBSOX and VRTGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OBSOXVRTGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.52%

-41.97%

-38.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.40%

-14.80%

+3.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.74%

-28.54%

+0.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.65%

-40.48%

+11.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.79%

-41.97%

-0.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.02%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.55%

-10.44%

-20.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

4.10%

-1.03%

Volatility

OBSOX vs. VRTGX - Volatility Comparison

Oberweis Small-Cap Opportunities Fund (OBSOX) has a higher volatility of 8.92% compared to Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX) at 6.44%. This indicates that OBSOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRTGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OBSOXVRTGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.92%

6.44%

+2.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.40%

15.87%

+4.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.56%

21.37%

+4.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.07%

24.55%

+0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.77%

24.51%

+0.26%

OBSOX vs. VRTGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OBSOX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VRTGX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

OBSOX vs. VRTGX - Dividend Comparison

OBSOX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRTGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OBSOX
Oberweis Small-Cap Opportunities Fund
0.00%0.00%0.80%0.00%0.17%21.88%4.05%3.04%28.22%6.36%4.24%11.91%
VRTGX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.60%0.57%0.62%0.85%0.78%0.54%0.53%0.90%0.85%0.75%1.07%0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


OBSOX and VRTGX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OBSOX has higher volatility (8.92%) compared to VRTGX (6.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OBSOX dropped -80.52% vs VRTGX's -41.97%.

OBSOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OBSOX and VRTGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer