PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OBSOX vs. NESGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OBSOX vs. NESGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Oberweis Small-Cap Opportunities Fund (OBSOX) and Needham Small Cap Growth Fund (NESGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OBSOX achieves a 36.53% return, which is significantly lower than NESGX's 81.77% return. Over the past 10 years, OBSOX has underperformed NESGX with an annualized return of 19.01%, while NESGX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.16% annualized return.


OBSOX

1D
2.92%
1M
8.39%
YTD
36.53%
6M
35.36%
1Y
60.95%
3Y*
24.06%
5Y*
17.06%
10Y*
19.01%

NESGX

1D
4.01%
1M
22.89%
YTD
81.77%
6M
79.23%
1Y
124.03%
3Y*
33.11%
5Y*
10.36%
10Y*
20.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OBSOX vs. NESGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OBSOX
Oberweis Small-Cap Opportunities Fund
36.53%14.28%16.13%15.81%-11.17%43.39%32.52%25.06%-7.05%25.55%
NESGX
Needham Small Cap Growth Fund
81.77%10.50%12.76%5.68%-30.21%10.59%71.90%54.42%-5.43%11.96%

Correlation

The correlation between OBSOX and NESGX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2002

0.83

The correlation between OBSOX and NESGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OBSOX vs. NESGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OBSOX
OBSOX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
OBSOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OBSOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
OBSOX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
OBSOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
OBSOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

NESGX
NESGX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
NESGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NESGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
NESGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
NESGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
NESGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OBSOX vs. NESGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oberweis Small-Cap Opportunities Fund (OBSOX) and Needham Small Cap Growth Fund (NESGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OBSOXNESGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.61

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.64

7.69

-2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.82

31.87

-11.06

OBSOX vs. NESGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OBSOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is lower than the NESGX Sharpe Ratio of 4.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OBSOX and NESGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OBSOXNESGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

4.36

-1.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.36

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.78

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.61

-0.28

Drawdowns

OBSOX vs. NESGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OBSOX drawdown since its inception was -80.52%, which is greater than NESGX's maximum drawdown of -50.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OBSOX and NESGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OBSOXNESGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.52%

-50.29%

-30.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.40%

-17.16%

+5.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.74%

-35.27%

+7.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.65%

-50.05%

+21.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.79%

-50.29%

+7.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.55%

-11.66%

-18.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

4.13%

-1.06%

Volatility

OBSOX vs. NESGX - Volatility Comparison

Oberweis Small-Cap Opportunities Fund (OBSOX) and Needham Small Cap Growth Fund (NESGX) have volatilities of 8.92% and 8.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OBSOXNESGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.92%

8.70%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.40%

21.09%

-0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.56%

30.24%

-4.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.07%

29.27%

-4.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.77%

25.83%

-1.06%

OBSOX vs. NESGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OBSOX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is lower than NESGX's 1.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

OBSOX vs. NESGX - Dividend Comparison

Neither OBSOX nor NESGX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NESGX
Needham Small Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.16%25.09%13.69%8.43%22.26%8.94%6.67%2.52%
OBSOX
Oberweis Small-Cap Opportunities Fund
0.00%0.00%0.80%0.00%0.17%21.88%4.05%3.04%28.22%6.36%4.24%11.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


OBSOX and NESGX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OBSOX has higher volatility (8.92%) compared to NESGX (8.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OBSOX dropped -80.52% vs NESGX's -50.29%.

NESGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.36 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OBSOX and NESGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer