OBOR vs. VEXC
OBOR (KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF) and VEXC (Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - OBOR tracks the MSCI Global China Infrastructure Exposure while VEXC tracks the FTSE Emerging ex China Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OBOR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VEXC.
Performance
OBOR vs. VEXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OBOR achieves a 3.11% return, which is significantly lower than VEXC's 20.21% return.
OBOR
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- 3.11%
- 6M
- 6.70%
- 1Y
- 23.10%
- 3Y*
- 11.59%
- 5Y*
- 0.84%
- 10Y*
- —
VEXC
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- 4.95%
- YTD
- 20.21%
- 6M
- 23.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OBOR vs. VEXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OBOR KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF | 3.11% | 6.82% |
VEXC Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 20.21% | 4.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between OBOR and VEXC is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2025 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OBOR vs. VEXC — Risk / Return Rank
OBOR
VEXC
OBOR vs. VEXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF (OBOR) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (VEXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OBOR | VEXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.62 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OBOR | VEXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 2.21 | -2.01 |
Drawdowns
OBOR vs. VEXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OBOR drawdown since its inception was -41.54%, which is greater than VEXC's maximum drawdown of -12.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OBOR and VEXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OBOR | VEXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.54% | -12.42% | -29.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.03% | -1.20% | -7.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.97% | -2.23% | -13.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.12% | — | — |
Volatility
OBOR vs. VEXC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OBOR | VEXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.38% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.84% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.10% | 18.89% | -2.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.05% | 18.89% | -2.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.52% | 18.89% | -0.37% |
OBOR vs. VEXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
OBOR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than VEXC's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
OBOR vs. VEXC - Dividend Comparison
OBOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, more than VEXC's 0.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OBOR KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF | 1.88% | 1.94% | 3.87% | 3.40% | 4.75% | 3.26% | 2.04% | 4.33% | 0.02% | 0.10% |
VEXC Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF | 0.74% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OBOR and VEXC have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VEXC is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VEXC is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for OBOR.
OBOR has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 0.74% for VEXC.
OBOR tracks MSCI Global China Infrastructure Exposure, while VEXC tracks FTSE Emerging ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: CICC and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for OBOR and 0.07% for VEXC.
Find the right allocation for OBOR and VEXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer