PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OAZMX vs. PSECX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OAZMX vs. PSECX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Oakmark Fund R6 Class (OAZMX) and 1789 Growth and Income Fund (PSECX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OAZMX achieves a -0.81% return, which is significantly lower than PSECX's 3.23% return.


OAZMX

1D
-0.79%
1M
-0.36%
YTD
-0.81%
6M
2.24%
1Y
11.77%
3Y*
15.35%
5Y*
9.65%
10Y*

PSECX

1D
0.52%
1M
-0.66%
YTD
3.23%
6M
2.17%
1Y
8.22%
3Y*
11.87%
5Y*
7.00%
10Y*
7.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OAZMX vs. PSECX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
OAZMX
Oakmark Fund R6 Class
-0.81%14.45%16.33%31.29%-13.16%34.59%1.81%
PSECX
1789 Growth and Income Fund
3.23%8.04%14.49%10.64%-10.66%25.43%1.51%

Correlation

The correlation between OAZMX and PSECX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2020

0.77

The correlation between OAZMX and PSECX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OAZMX vs. PSECX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OAZMX
OAZMX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
OAZMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OAZMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
OAZMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
OAZMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
OAZMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

PSECX
PSECX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
PSECX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSECX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSECX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
PSECX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSECX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OAZMX vs. PSECX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oakmark Fund R6 Class (OAZMX) and 1789 Growth and Income Fund (PSECX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OAZMXPSECXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.15

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

1.15

+0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.70

4.26

+0.44

OAZMX vs. PSECX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OAZMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is comparable to the PSECX Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OAZMX and PSECX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OAZMXPSECXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

0.87

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.59

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.56

+0.23

Drawdowns

OAZMX vs. PSECX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OAZMX drawdown since its inception was -23.54%, smaller than the maximum PSECX drawdown of -31.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OAZMX and PSECX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OAZMXPSECXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.54%

-31.13%

+7.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.93%

-7.44%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.01%

-12.51%

-4.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.54%

-18.47%

-5.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.36%

-2.49%

-0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.73%

-3.88%

-0.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

2.00%

+0.68%

Volatility

OAZMX vs. PSECX - Volatility Comparison

Oakmark Fund R6 Class (OAZMX) has a higher volatility of 2.93% compared to 1789 Growth and Income Fund (PSECX) at 2.71%. This indicates that OAZMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSECX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OAZMXPSECXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.93%

2.71%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.34%

7.71%

+1.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.01%

9.89%

+3.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.27%

11.94%

+6.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.19%

13.20%

+4.99%

OAZMX vs. PSECX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OAZMX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than PSECX's 2.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

OAZMX vs. PSECX - Dividend Comparison

OAZMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, more than PSECX's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OAZMX
Oakmark Fund R6 Class
1.21%1.20%1.38%1.26%1.22%1.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PSECX
1789 Growth and Income Fund
0.98%0.85%3.88%2.71%4.60%1.53%0.27%1.16%6.78%0.59%0.31%5.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


OAZMX and PSECX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OAZMX has higher volatility (2.93%) compared to PSECX (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OAZMX dropped -23.54% vs PSECX's -31.13%.

OAZMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OAZMX and PSECX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer