PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OAZMX vs. PSECX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

OAZMX vs. PSECX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Oakmark Fund R6 Class (OAZMX) and 1789 Growth and Income Fund (PSECX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

OAZMX vs. PSECX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
OAZMX
Oakmark Fund R6 Class
-2.39%14.45%16.33%31.29%-13.16%34.59%1.81%
PSECX
1789 Growth and Income Fund
-0.58%8.04%14.49%10.64%-10.66%25.43%1.51%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OAZMX achieves a -2.39% return, which is significantly lower than PSECX's -0.58% return.


OAZMX

1D
1.76%
1M
-3.54%
YTD
-2.39%
6M
2.45%
1Y
10.44%
3Y*
16.40%
5Y*
11.18%
10Y*

PSECX

1D
1.46%
1M
-5.95%
YTD
-0.58%
6M
-1.96%
1Y
8.21%
3Y*
10.31%
5Y*
7.34%
10Y*
7.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


OAZMX vs. PSECX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OAZMX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than PSECX's 2.02% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

OAZMX vs. PSECX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OAZMX
OAZMX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
OAZMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OAZMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
OAZMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
OAZMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
OAZMX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

PSECX
PSECX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
PSECX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSECX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSECX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
PSECX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSECX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OAZMX vs. PSECX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oakmark Fund R6 Class (OAZMX) and 1789 Growth and Income Fund (PSECX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OAZMXPSECXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.56

0.63

-0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.89

1.00

-0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.13

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.84

1.11

-0.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.37

4.41

-1.04

OAZMX vs. PSECX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OAZMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is comparable to the PSECX Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OAZMX and PSECX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OAZMXPSECXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

0.63

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.62

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.54

+0.25

Correlation

The correlation between OAZMX and PSECX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

OAZMX vs. PSECX - Dividend Comparison

OAZMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than PSECX's 0.85% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OAZMX
Oakmark Fund R6 Class
1.23%1.20%1.38%1.26%1.22%1.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PSECX
1789 Growth and Income Fund
0.85%0.85%3.88%2.71%4.60%1.53%0.27%1.16%6.78%0.59%0.31%5.12%

Drawdowns

OAZMX vs. PSECX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OAZMX drawdown since its inception was -23.54%, smaller than the maximum PSECX drawdown of -31.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OAZMX and PSECX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


OAZMXPSECXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.54%

-31.13%

+7.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.46%

-8.36%

-5.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.54%

-18.47%

-5.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.90%

-6.09%

+1.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.78%

-3.90%

-0.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

2.10%

+1.27%

Volatility

OAZMX vs. PSECX - Volatility Comparison

Oakmark Fund R6 Class (OAZMX) has a higher volatility of 4.21% compared to 1789 Growth and Income Fund (PSECX) at 3.54%. This indicates that OAZMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSECX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


OAZMXPSECXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

3.54%

+0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.35%

7.74%

+2.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.78%

13.18%

+5.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.34%

11.92%

+6.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.39%

13.18%

+5.21%