PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OAKMX vs. PIMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OAKMX vs. PIMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Oakmark Fund Investor Class (OAKMX) and PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class (PIMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OAKMX achieves a -1.16% return, which is significantly lower than PIMIX's 0.91% return. Over the past 10 years, OAKMX has outperformed PIMIX with an annualized return of 13.52%, while PIMIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.70% annualized return.


OAKMX

1D
0.57%
1M
1.33%
YTD
-1.16%
6M
-1.64%
1Y
10.14%
3Y*
14.13%
5Y*
9.52%
10Y*
13.52%

PIMIX

1D
0.56%
1M
1.76%
YTD
0.91%
6M
1.78%
1Y
7.88%
3Y*
7.70%
5Y*
3.44%
10Y*
4.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OAKMX vs. PIMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OAKMX
Oakmark Fund Investor Class
-1.16%14.13%16.02%30.92%-13.38%34.85%12.90%27.14%-12.76%21.12%
PIMIX
PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class
0.91%11.08%5.45%9.36%-9.07%2.62%5.84%8.10%0.63%8.63%

Correlation

The correlation between OAKMX and PIMIX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2007

0.13

The correlation between OAKMX and PIMIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.33 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OAKMX vs. PIMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OAKMX
OAKMX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
OAKMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OAKMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
OAKMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
OAKMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
OAKMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

PIMIX
PIMIX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
PIMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
PIMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OAKMX vs. PIMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oakmark Fund Investor Class (OAKMX) and PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class (PIMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OAKMXPIMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.36

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

2.12

-0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.18

7.21

-4.04

OAKMX vs. PIMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OAKMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the PIMIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OAKMX and PIMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OAKMX vs. PIMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OAKMX drawdown since its inception was -56.19%, which is greater than PIMIX's maximum drawdown of -13.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OAKMX and PIMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OAKMXPIMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.19%

-13.39%

-42.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.98%

-3.69%

-3.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.05%

-3.84%

-13.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.68%

-13.34%

-10.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.43%

-13.39%

-28.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.69%

-1.02%

-2.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.39%

-1.69%

-4.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

1.08%

+1.71%

Volatility

OAKMX vs. PIMIX - Volatility Comparison

Oakmark Fund Investor Class (OAKMX) has a higher volatility of 3.66% compared to PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class (PIMIX) at 1.67%. This indicates that OAKMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PIMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OAKMXPIMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.66%

1.67%

+1.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.57%

3.37%

+6.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.13%

4.17%

+8.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.32%

4.86%

+13.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.40%

4.26%

+16.14%

OAKMX vs. PIMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OAKMX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than PIMIX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

OAKMX vs. PIMIX - Dividend Comparison

OAKMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than PIMIX's 5.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OAKMX
Oakmark Fund Investor Class
0.93%0.92%1.12%1.02%0.92%1.94%0.17%8.33%8.13%4.06%2.58%1.43%
PIMIX
PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class
5.83%6.01%6.27%6.21%4.98%4.02%4.88%5.83%5.66%5.37%5.52%7.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


OAKMX and PIMIX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OAKMX has higher volatility (3.66%) compared to PIMIX (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OAKMX dropped -56.19% vs PIMIX's -13.39%.

PIMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OAKMX and PIMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer