OAKMX vs. FCNKX
Compare and contrast key facts about Oakmark Fund Investor Class (OAKMX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNKX).
OAKMX is managed by Oakmark. It was launched on Aug 5, 1991. FCNKX is managed by Fidelity.
Performance
OAKMX vs. FCNKX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
OAKMX vs. FCNKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OAKMX Oakmark Fund Investor Class | -2.81% | 14.13% | 16.02% | 30.92% | -13.38% | 34.85% | 12.90% | 27.14% | -12.76% | 21.12% |
FCNKX Fidelity Contrafund Fund | -4.59% | 21.88% | 36.08% | 39.50% | -27.44% | 24.66% | 32.50% | 30.18% | -2.27% | 32.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OAKMX achieves a -2.81% return, which is significantly higher than FCNKX's -4.59% return. Over the past 10 years, OAKMX has underperformed FCNKX with an annualized return of 13.47%, while FCNKX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.58% annualized return.
OAKMX
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -3.34%
- YTD
- -2.81%
- 6M
- 2.17%
- 1Y
- 8.85%
- 3Y*
- 15.94%
- 5Y*
- 10.90%
- 10Y*
- 13.47%
FCNKX
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- -4.04%
- YTD
- -4.59%
- 6M
- -2.10%
- 1Y
- 19.52%
- 3Y*
- 25.55%
- 5Y*
- 13.85%
- 10Y*
- 16.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
OAKMX vs. FCNKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
OAKMX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNKX's 0.74% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
OAKMX vs. FCNKX — Risk / Return Rank
OAKMX
FCNKX
OAKMX vs. FCNKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oakmark Fund Investor Class (OAKMX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OAKMX | FCNKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.52 | 1.02 | -0.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.85 | 1.57 | -0.72 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.22 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.72 | 1.88 | -1.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.84 | 7.12 | -4.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OAKMX | FCNKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 | 1.02 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.73 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.06 | +0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.06 | +0.65 |
Correlation
The correlation between OAKMX and FCNKX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
OAKMX vs. FCNKX - Dividend Comparison
OAKMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than FCNKX's 4.87% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OAKMX Oakmark Fund Investor Class | 0.94% | 0.92% | 1.12% | 1.02% | 0.92% | 1.94% | 0.17% | 8.33% | 8.13% | 4.06% | 2.58% | 1.43% |
FCNKX Fidelity Contrafund Fund | 4.87% | 5.18% | 4.28% | 4.31% | 13.69% | 10.77% | 8.00% | 4.15% | 9.14% | 6.09% | 3.92% | 4.47% |
Drawdowns
OAKMX vs. FCNKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OAKMX drawdown since its inception was -56.19%, smaller than the maximum FCNKX drawdown of -90.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OAKMX and FCNKX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| OAKMX | FCNKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.19% | -90.08% | +33.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.42% | -11.29% | +2.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.68% | -31.77% | +8.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.43% | -90.08% | +48.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.30% | -7.43% | +2.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.41% | -7.38% | +0.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 2.98% | +0.42% |
Volatility
OAKMX vs. FCNKX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Oakmark Fund Investor Class (OAKMX) is 4.18%, while Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNKX) has a volatility of 6.61%. This indicates that OAKMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCNKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| OAKMX | FCNKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.18% | 6.61% | -2.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.34% | 11.19% | -0.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.76% | 20.00% | -1.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.34% | 19.14% | -0.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.42% | 288.01% | -267.59% |