PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
O vs. EMXC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

O vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Realty Income Corporation (O) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, O achieves a 13.70% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC's 37.25% return.


O

1D
1.31%
1M
3.07%
YTD
13.70%
6M
11.57%
1Y
14.88%
3Y*
6.59%
5Y*
3.49%
10Y*
4.89%

EMXC

1D
0.55%
1M
6.57%
YTD
37.25%
6M
42.23%
1Y
67.80%
3Y*
26.47%
5Y*
12.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

O vs. EMXC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
O
Realty Income Corporation
13.70%12.20%-2.11%-4.55%-7.38%23.95%-11.60%21.27%15.94%1.55%
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
37.25%35.14%2.68%18.96%-19.56%8.54%12.76%15.80%-12.96%7.16%

Correlation

The correlation between O and EMXC is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2017

0.22

The correlation between O and EMXC shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

O vs. EMXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

O
O Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
O Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
O Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
O Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
O Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
O Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

EMXC
EMXC Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
EMXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMXC Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
EMXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMXC Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

O vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Realty Income Corporation (O) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OEMXCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.50

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

4.55

-3.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.12

17.51

-14.40

O vs. EMXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current O Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the EMXC Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of O and EMXC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

O vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum O drawdown since its inception was -48.45%, which is greater than EMXC's maximum drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for O and EMXC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OEMXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.45%

-42.81%

-5.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.10%

-14.41%

+3.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.49%

-19.12%

-7.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.48%

-28.91%

-5.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.94%

-4.12%

-1.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.20%

-10.17%

+0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.58%

3.74%

+0.84%

Volatility

O vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Realty Income Corporation (O) is 5.29%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a volatility of 12.83%. This indicates that O experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OEMXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.29%

12.83%

-7.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.98%

21.90%

-9.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.21%

23.90%

-7.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.92%

18.00%

+0.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.64%

20.07%

+5.57%

Dividends

O vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison

O's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, more than EMXC's 2.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
2.05%2.82%2.69%1.83%2.85%1.78%1.45%3.25%2.63%0.99%0.00%0.00%
O
Realty Income Corporation
5.16%6.19%5.37%5.33%4.68%3.87%4.51%3.69%4.19%4.45%4.18%4.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


O and EMXC have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMXC has higher volatility (12.83%) compared to O (5.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, O dropped -48.45% vs EMXC's -42.81%.

EMXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for O and EMXC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer