PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NYVTX vs. TRBCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NYVTX vs. TRBCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Davis New York Venture Fund (NYVTX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NYVTX achieves a 11.17% return, which is significantly higher than TRBCX's 5.48% return. Over the past 10 years, NYVTX has underperformed TRBCX with an annualized return of 13.08%, while TRBCX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.69% annualized return.


NYVTX

1D
0.22%
1M
2.39%
YTD
11.17%
6M
14.19%
1Y
33.52%
3Y*
24.05%
5Y*
10.43%
10Y*
13.08%

TRBCX

1D
-0.69%
1M
5.17%
YTD
5.48%
6M
5.64%
1Y
22.08%
3Y*
28.80%
5Y*
13.81%
10Y*
17.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NYVTX vs. TRBCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NYVTX
Davis New York Venture Fund
11.17%26.83%17.27%30.14%-17.54%12.47%11.42%30.99%-12.99%22.18%
TRBCX
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund
5.48%18.78%48.46%49.42%-38.57%17.54%34.73%29.97%2.00%36.54%

Correlation

The correlation between NYVTX and TRBCX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1993

0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between NYVTX and TRBCX has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NYVTX vs. TRBCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NYVTX
NYVTX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
NYVTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NYVTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
NYVTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
NYVTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
NYVTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

TRBCX
TRBCX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
TRBCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRBCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRBCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
TRBCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRBCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NYVTX vs. TRBCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Davis New York Venture Fund (NYVTX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NYVTXTRBCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.75

1.37

+1.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.73

1.87

+1.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.25

+0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.26

1.34

+2.92

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.47

4.54

+11.93

NYVTX vs. TRBCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NYVTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is higher than the TRBCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NYVTX and TRBCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NYVTXTRBCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75

1.37

+1.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.58

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.78

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.60

-0.10

Drawdowns

NYVTX vs. TRBCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NYVTX drawdown since its inception was -58.56%, which is greater than TRBCX's maximum drawdown of -54.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NYVTX and TRBCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NYVTXTRBCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.56%

-54.56%

-4.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.01%

-17.01%

+9.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.77%

-23.08%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.17%

-43.63%

+11.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.98%

-43.63%

+6.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-0.69%

+0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.17%

-11.31%

+1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

5.01%

-2.94%

Volatility

NYVTX vs. TRBCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Davis New York Venture Fund (NYVTX) is 2.68%, while T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX) has a volatility of 3.57%. This indicates that NYVTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRBCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NYVTXTRBCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.68%

3.57%

-0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.74%

13.37%

-4.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.44%

16.66%

-4.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.78%

24.03%

-4.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.04%

22.79%

-2.75%

NYVTX vs. TRBCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NYVTX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than TRBCX's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

NYVTX vs. TRBCX - Dividend Comparison

NYVTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.31%, more than TRBCX's 4.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NYVTX
Davis New York Venture Fund
10.31%11.46%21.31%7.92%7.48%21.93%5.88%7.54%24.08%8.32%12.85%22.97%
TRBCX
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund
4.97%5.25%18.16%3.49%5.87%9.38%1.19%0.36%2.44%2.94%0.67%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


NYVTX and TRBCX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRBCX has higher volatility (3.57%) compared to NYVTX (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NYVTX dropped -58.56% vs TRBCX's -54.56%.

NYVTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NYVTX and TRBCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer