NYM vs. HYMB
NYM (AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF) and HYMB (SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. NYM is actively managed, while HYMB is passively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NYM charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for HYMB.
Performance
NYM vs. HYMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NYM achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than HYMB's 2.87% return.
NYM
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYMB
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 1.19%
- YTD
- 2.87%
- 6M
- 3.18%
- 1Y
- 7.43%
- 3Y*
- 5.09%
- 5Y*
- 0.42%
- 10Y*
- 2.46%
NYM vs. HYMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NYM AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF | 1.43% | 0.41% |
HYMB SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF | 2.87% | 0.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between NYM and HYMB is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2025 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NYM vs. HYMB — Risk / Return Rank
NYM
HYMB
NYM vs. HYMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF (NYM) and SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NYM | HYMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.63 | 0.45 | +1.18 |
Drawdowns
NYM vs. HYMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NYM drawdown since its inception was -1.76%, smaller than the maximum HYMB drawdown of -29.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NYM and HYMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NYM | HYMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.76% | -29.57% | +27.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -0.04% | -0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.42% | -3.81% | +3.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.88% | — |
Volatility
NYM vs. HYMB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NYM | HYMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.35% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06% | 4.05% | -1.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.06% | 6.66% | -4.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.06% | 11.36% | -9.30% |
NYM vs. HYMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
NYM has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than HYMB's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
NYM vs. HYMB - Dividend Comparison
NYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, less than HYMB's 4.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYMB SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF | 4.54% | 4.55% | 4.29% | 4.07% | 3.77% | 3.19% | 3.55% | 3.95% | 4.03% | 3.78% | 4.08% | 4.54% |
NYM AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF | 1.73% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NYM and HYMB have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NYM is cheaper at 0.27% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NYM is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for HYMB.
HYMB has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 1.73% for NYM.
They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for NYM and 0.35% for HYMB.
Find the right allocation for NYM and HYMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer