PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NXTG.L vs. FTFX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NXTG.L vs. FTFX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in First Trust Indxx NextG UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (NXTG.L) and First Trust FactorFX UCITS ETF Class A USD (Acc) (FTFX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

NXTG.L is traded in GBp, while FTFX.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FTFX.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NXTG.L achieves a 33.02% return, which is significantly higher than FTFX.L's 6.87% return.


NXTG.L

1D
-1.06%
1M
-8.46%
6M
28.75%
YTD
33.02%
1Y
48.28%
3Y*
14.91%
5Y*
8.92%
10Y*
6.30%

FTFX.L

1D
0.42%
1M
0.56%
6M
5.28%
YTD
6.87%
1Y
9.53%
3Y*
5.66%
5Y*
6.40%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NXTG.L vs. FTFX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NXTG.L
First Trust Indxx NextG UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
33.02%19.23%14.96%0.29%-24.39%15.88%4.17%8.33%-27.67%14.25%
FTFX.L
First Trust FactorFX UCITS ETF Class A USD (Acc)
6.87%0.44%9.81%4.47%10.62%-2.51%-2.61%0.21%6.04%-2.88%

Correlation

The correlation between NXTG.L and FTFX.L is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2017

-0.07

The correlation between NXTG.L and FTFX.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (5 years) to 0.03 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NXTG.L vs. FTFX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NXTG.L
NXTG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
NXTG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NXTG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
NXTG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
NXTG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
NXTG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

FTFX.L
FTFX.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FTFX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTFX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTFX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FTFX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTFX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NXTG.L vs. FTFX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx NextG UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (NXTG.L) and First Trust FactorFX UCITS ETF Class A USD (Acc) (FTFX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NXTG.LFTFX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.19

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

2.29

-0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.93

6.18

-2.25

NXTG.L vs. FTFX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NXTG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is comparable to the FTFX.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NXTG.L and FTFX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NXTG.L vs. FTFX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NXTG.L drawdown since its inception was -45.94%, which is greater than FTFX.L's maximum drawdown of -15.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXTG.L and FTFX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NXTG.LFTFX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.94%

-15.71%

-30.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.38%

-4.14%

-21.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.89%

-11.41%

-20.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.91%

-12.32%

-20.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.62%

-0.42%

-13.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.85%

-6.07%

-13.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.24%

1.54%

+10.70%

Volatility

NXTG.L vs. FTFX.L - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Indxx NextG UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (NXTG.L) has a higher volatility of 6.64% compared to First Trust FactorFX UCITS ETF Class A USD (Acc) (FTFX.L) at 2.27%. This indicates that NXTG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTFX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NXTG.LFTFX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.64%

2.27%

+4.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.87%

6.66%

+9.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.86%

8.92%

+37.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.04%

10.78%

+32.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.81%

10.08%

+22.73%

NXTG.L vs. FTFX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

NXTG.L has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than FTFX.L's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

NXTG.L vs. FTFX.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither NXTG.L nor FTFX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


NXTG.L and FTFX.L have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NXTG.L is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NXTG.L is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FTFX.L.

NXTG.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while FTFX.L is Currency. NXTG.L tracks Indxx 5G & NextG Thematic Index, while FTFX.L tracks Bloomberg G10 Carry Index. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for NXTG.L and 0.75% for FTFX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NXTG.L and FTFX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer