PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NXTG.L vs. FSKY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NXTG.L vs. FSKY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in First Trust Indxx NextG UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (NXTG.L) and First Trust Cloud Computing UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (FSKY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NXTG.L achieves a 33.02% return, which is significantly higher than FSKY.L's 2.39% return.


NXTG.L

1D
-1.06%
1M
-8.46%
6M
28.75%
YTD
33.02%
1Y
48.28%
3Y*
14.91%
5Y*
8.92%
10Y*
6.30%

FSKY.L

1D
-1.37%
1M
-1.41%
6M
6.33%
YTD
2.39%
1Y
9.34%
3Y*
17.72%
5Y*
5.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NXTG.L vs. FSKY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
NXTG.L
First Trust Indxx NextG UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
33.02%19.23%14.96%0.29%-24.39%15.88%4.17%8.33%3.20%
FSKY.L
First Trust Cloud Computing UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation
2.39%1.06%37.83%47.12%-39.21%12.29%54.03%18.63%-19.98%

Correlation

The correlation between NXTG.L and FSKY.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2018

0.48

The correlation between NXTG.L and FSKY.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.55 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NXTG.L vs. FSKY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NXTG.L
NXTG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
NXTG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NXTG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
NXTG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
NXTG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
NXTG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

FSKY.L
FSKY.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
FSKY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSKY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSKY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
FSKY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSKY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NXTG.L vs. FSKY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx NextG UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (NXTG.L) and First Trust Cloud Computing UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (FSKY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NXTG.LFSKY.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.08

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

0.33

+1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.93

0.68

+3.25

NXTG.L vs. FSKY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NXTG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is higher than the FSKY.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NXTG.L and FSKY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NXTG.L vs. FSKY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NXTG.L drawdown since its inception was -45.94%, roughly equal to the maximum FSKY.L drawdown of -47.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXTG.L and FSKY.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NXTG.LFSKY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.94%

-47.61%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.38%

-28.23%

+2.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.89%

-34.05%

+2.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.91%

-47.61%

+14.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.62%

-12.80%

-0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.85%

-16.00%

-3.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.24%

13.70%

-1.46%

Volatility

NXTG.L vs. FSKY.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Indxx NextG UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (NXTG.L) is 6.64%, while First Trust Cloud Computing UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (FSKY.L) has a volatility of 8.19%. This indicates that NXTG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSKY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NXTG.LFSKY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.64%

8.19%

-1.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.87%

25.01%

-9.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.86%

29.40%

+17.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.04%

31.32%

+11.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.81%

30.35%

+2.46%

NXTG.L vs. FSKY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

NXTG.L has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKY.L's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

NXTG.L vs. FSKY.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither NXTG.L nor FSKY.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


NXTG.L and FSKY.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FSKY.L is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FSKY.L is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for NXTG.L.

NXTG.L tracks Indxx 5G & NextG Thematic Index, while FSKY.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for NXTG.L and 0.60% for FSKY.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NXTG.L and FSKY.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer