NXF.TO vs. SOLX.TO
NXF.TO (CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged)) and SOLX.TO (CI Galaxy Solana ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NXF.TO is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by CI, while SOLX.TO is a Cryptocurrency fund managed by CI. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NXF.TO vs. SOLX.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NXF.TO achieves a 16.85% return, which is significantly higher than SOLX.TO's -46.84% return.
NXF.TO
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -10.20%
- YTD
- 16.85%
- 6M
- 18.83%
- 1Y
- 25.99%
- 3Y*
- 10.52%
- 5Y*
- 14.11%
- 10Y*
- 7.12%
SOLX.TO
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -20.96%
- YTD
- -46.84%
- 6M
- -47.01%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NXF.TO vs. SOLX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NXF.TO CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged) | 16.85% | -0.20% |
SOLX.TO CI Galaxy Solana ETF | -46.84% | -40.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between NXF.TO and SOLX.TO is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2025 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NXF.TO vs. SOLX.TO — Risk / Return Rank
NXF.TO
SOLX.TO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NXF.TO vs. SOLX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged) (NXF.TO) and CI Galaxy Solana ETF (SOLX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NXF.TO | SOLX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.01 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NXF.TO vs. SOLX.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NXF.TO drawdown since its inception was -65.25%, smaller than the maximum SOLX.TO drawdown of -75.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXF.TO and SOLX.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NXF.TO | SOLX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.25% | -75.14% | +9.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.18% | -73.87% | +57.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.97% | -49.50% | +33.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.34% | — | — |
Volatility
NXF.TO vs. SOLX.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NXF.TO | SOLX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.94% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.36% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.80% | 74.85% | -55.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.43% | 74.85% | -51.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.09% | 74.85% | -48.76% |
Dividends
NXF.TO vs. SOLX.TO - Dividend Comparison
NXF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.77%, while SOLX.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NXF.TO CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged) | 8.77% | 7.70% | 8.50% | 8.60% | 11.22% | 9.46% | 11.24% | 7.83% | 9.39% | 6.49% | 8.24% | 8.21% |
SOLX.TO CI Galaxy Solana ETF | 0.91% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NXF.TO and SOLX.TO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NXF.TO is categorized as Energy Equities, while SOLX.TO is Cryptocurrency.
Find the right allocation for NXF.TO and SOLX.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer