NXF.TO vs. EHE.TO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

NXF.TO (CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged)) and EHE.TO (CI Europe Hedged Equity Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NXF.TO is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by CI, while EHE.TO is a Europe Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Europe CAD-Hedged Equity Index. NXF.TO is actively managed, while EHE.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NXF.TO returned 14.81%/yr vs 9.99%/yr for EHE.TO. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

NXF.TO vs. EHE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged) (NXF.TO) and CI Europe Hedged Equity Index ETF (EHE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NXF.TO achieves a 19.97% return, which is significantly higher than EHE.TO's 7.29% return.

NXF.TO

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: -10.06%
• YTD: 19.97%
• 6M: 21.31%
• 1Y: 26.56%
• 3Y*: 12.09%
• 5Y*: 14.81%
• 10Y*: 7.02%

EHE.TO

• 1D: -1.08%
• 1M: 2.24%
• YTD: 7.29%
• 6M: 7.63%
• 1Y: 20.04%
• 3Y*: 12.63%
• 5Y*: 9.99%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NXF.TO vs. EHE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NXF.TO CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged)	19.97%	9.09%	-4.58%	6.48%	43.93%	40.62%	-35.30%	6.23%	-9.26%	3.08%
EHE.TO CI Europe Hedged Equity Index ETF	7.29%	22.91%	4.20%	22.26%	-10.45%	23.79%	-5.96%	24.49%	-10.68%	15.40%

Correlation

The correlation between NXF.TO and EHE.TO is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.01
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2016	0.17

The correlation between NXF.TO and EHE.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NXF.TO vs. EHE.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NXF.TO	EHE.TO
Energy	100.0%	3.7%
Basic Materials	-	6.8%
Communication Services	-	5.6%
Consumer Cyclical	-	13.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	12.4%
Financial Services	-	15.1%
Healthcare	-	8.1%
Industrials	-	22.6%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	12.1%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

NXF.TO vs. EHE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NXF.TO

NXF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 39
NXF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
NXF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
NXF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 37
NXF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
NXF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 43

EHE.TO

EHE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 39
EHE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
EHE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
EHE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 39
EHE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
EHE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NXF.TO vs. EHE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged) (NXF.TO) and CI Europe Hedged Equity Index ETF (EHE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NXF.TO	EHE.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	1.23	+0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.85	1.84	+0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.24	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.77	1.71	+0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.50	6.43	+0.07

NXF.TO vs. EHE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NXF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the EHE.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NXF.TO and EHE.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NXF.TO vs. EHE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NXF.TO drawdown since its inception was -65.25%, which is greater than EHE.TO's maximum drawdown of -38.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXF.TO and EHE.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	NXF.TO	EHE.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.25%	-38.20%	-27.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.04%	-11.85%	-3.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.32%	-16.30%	-8.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.32%	-22.91%	-1.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-65.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.94%	-1.08%	-12.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.97%	-5.33%	-10.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.10%	3.13%	+0.97%

Volatility

NXF.TO vs. EHE.TO - Volatility Comparison

CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged) (NXF.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.84% compared to CI Europe Hedged Equity Index ETF (EHE.TO) at 5.45%. This indicates that NXF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EHE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NXF.TO	EHE.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.84%	5.45%	+1.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.16%	13.32%	+2.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.93%	16.40%	+3.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.41%	18.09%	+5.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.08%	17.46%	+8.62%

Dividends

NXF.TO vs. EHE.TO - Dividend Comparison

NXF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.88%, more than EHE.TO's 2.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EHE.TO CI Europe Hedged Equity Index ETF	2.00%	2.16%	4.38%	3.30%	2.19%	1.90%	2.55%	2.02%	2.08%	1.37%	0.13%	0.00%
NXF.TO CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged)	8.88%	7.70%	8.50%	8.60%	11.22%	9.46%	11.24%	7.83%	9.39%	6.49%	8.24%	8.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NXF.TO and EHE.TO in my portfolio?

NXF.TO and EHE.TO have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

What is the main difference between NXF.TO and EHE.TO?

NXF.TO is categorized as Energy Equities, while EHE.TO is Europe Equities.