PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NWOSX vs. GMXAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NWOSX vs. GMXAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide Destination 2050 Fund (NWOSX) and Nationwide Mid Cap Market Index Fund (GMXAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NWOSX achieves a 11.08% return, which is significantly lower than GMXAX's 13.94% return. Over the past 10 years, NWOSX has outperformed GMXAX with an annualized return of 10.13%, while GMXAX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.42% annualized return.


NWOSX

1D
0.29%
1M
4.27%
YTD
11.08%
6M
12.45%
1Y
26.06%
3Y*
18.16%
5Y*
8.89%
10Y*
10.13%

GMXAX

1D
0.88%
1M
3.89%
YTD
13.94%
6M
14.16%
1Y
24.97%
3Y*
15.19%
5Y*
7.61%
10Y*
9.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NWOSX vs. GMXAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NWOSX
Nationwide Destination 2050 Fund
11.08%19.12%12.86%19.96%-18.85%16.69%13.70%20.56%-8.99%17.09%
GMXAX
Nationwide Mid Cap Market Index Fund
13.94%6.84%12.15%15.89%-13.45%24.33%12.79%25.35%-10.65%2.80%

Correlation

The correlation between NWOSX and GMXAX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2007

0.92

The correlation between NWOSX and GMXAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NWOSX vs. GMXAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NWOSX
NWOSX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
NWOSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWOSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWOSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
NWOSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWOSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

GMXAX
GMXAX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
GMXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
GMXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NWOSX vs. GMXAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Destination 2050 Fund (NWOSX) and Nationwide Mid Cap Market Index Fund (GMXAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NWOSXGMXAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.35

1.73

+0.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.32

2.51

+0.82

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.30

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

3.02

+0.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.73

10.94

+2.79

NWOSX vs. GMXAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NWOSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is higher than the GMXAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NWOSX and GMXAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NWOSXGMXAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

1.73

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.39

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.44

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.41

-0.03

Drawdowns

NWOSX vs. GMXAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NWOSX drawdown since its inception was -55.99%, roughly equal to the maximum GMXAX drawdown of -55.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWOSX and GMXAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NWOSXGMXAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.99%

-55.64%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.69%

-8.83%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.64%

-24.21%

+9.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.98%

-24.21%

-6.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.78%

-42.22%

+7.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.65%

-8.06%

-1.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

2.43%

-0.49%

Volatility

NWOSX vs. GMXAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nationwide Destination 2050 Fund (NWOSX) is 3.45%, while Nationwide Mid Cap Market Index Fund (GMXAX) has a volatility of 4.42%. This indicates that NWOSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMXAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NWOSXGMXAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.45%

4.42%

-0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.19%

11.29%

-2.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.43%

15.42%

-3.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.48%

19.70%

-4.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.29%

21.31%

-5.02%

NWOSX vs. GMXAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NWOSX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than GMXAX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

NWOSX vs. GMXAX - Dividend Comparison

NWOSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.26%, less than GMXAX's 11.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMXAX
Nationwide Mid Cap Market Index Fund
11.44%12.93%11.73%6.17%9.58%12.52%3.18%5.18%23.21%0.85%9.60%13.94%
NWOSX
Nationwide Destination 2050 Fund
8.26%9.15%14.74%5.41%2.70%8.89%6.64%7.16%10.70%4.85%7.38%5.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


NWOSX and GMXAX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GMXAX has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to NWOSX (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWOSX dropped -55.99% vs GMXAX's -55.64%.

NWOSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NWOSX and GMXAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer