NWHLX vs. LIAGX
NWHLX (Nationwide Bailard International Equities Fund) and LIAGX (Lord Abbett International Growth Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, NWHLX returned 22.22%/yr vs 21.57%/yr for LIAGX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NWHLX charges 0.93%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for LIAGX.
Performance
NWHLX vs. LIAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NWHLX achieves a 14.77% return, which is significantly lower than LIAGX's 26.91% return.
NWHLX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- YTD
- 14.77%
- 6M
- 17.43%
- 1Y
- 29.28%
- 3Y*
- 22.22%
- 5Y*
- 10.78%
- 10Y*
- 9.15%
LIAGX
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 3.61%
- YTD
- 26.91%
- 6M
- 27.63%
- 1Y
- 39.07%
- 3Y*
- 21.57%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NWHLX vs. LIAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NWHLX Nationwide Bailard International Equities Fund | 14.77% | 34.77% | 7.37% | 21.75% | -15.90% | -0.52% |
LIAGX Lord Abbett International Growth Fund | 26.91% | 25.09% | 9.43% | 15.73% | -26.63% | 0.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between NWHLX and LIAGX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2021 | 0.91 |
The correlation between NWHLX and LIAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NWHLX vs. LIAGX — Risk / Return Rank
NWHLX
LIAGX
NWHLX vs. LIAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Bailard International Equities Fund (NWHLX) and Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NWHLX | LIAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.35 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | 2.72 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.02 | 10.93 | -0.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NWHLX | LIAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06 | 1.92 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.44 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
NWHLX vs. LIAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NWHLX drawdown since its inception was -38.83%, roughly equal to the maximum LIAGX drawdown of -37.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWHLX and LIAGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NWHLX | LIAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.83% | -37.87% | -0.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.02% | -14.56% | +3.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.74% | -17.11% | +3.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.68% | +0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.94% | -13.22% | +5.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | 3.62% | -0.69% |
Volatility
NWHLX vs. LIAGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nationwide Bailard International Equities Fund (NWHLX) is 4.58%, while Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX) has a volatility of 8.20%. This indicates that NWHLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NWHLX | LIAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.58% | 8.20% | -3.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.94% | 17.97% | -6.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.31% | 20.65% | -6.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.50% | 18.78% | -3.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 18.78% | -2.54% |
NWHLX vs. LIAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NWHLX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than LIAGX's 0.81% expense ratio.
Dividends
NWHLX vs. LIAGX - Dividend Comparison
NWHLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.23%, more than LIAGX's 0.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIAGX Lord Abbett International Growth Fund | 0.30% | 0.38% | 0.48% | 0.71% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NWHLX Nationwide Bailard International Equities Fund | 7.23% | 8.12% | 3.80% | 2.75% | 2.91% | 2.77% | 1.43% | 2.71% | 5.62% | 2.05% | 2.14% | 2.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NWHLX and LIAGX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LIAGX has higher volatility (8.20%) compared to NWHLX (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWHLX dropped -38.83% vs LIAGX's -37.87%.
NWHLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NWHLX and LIAGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer