PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVO vs. 0941.HK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NVO vs. 0941.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO) and China Mobile Ltd (0941.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

NVO is traded in USD, while 0941.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 0941.HK values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVO achieves a -10.74% return, which is significantly lower than 0941.HK's 2.49% return. Over the past 10 years, NVO has outperformed 0941.HK with an annualized return of 7.56%, while 0941.HK has yielded a comparatively lower 5.25% annualized return.


NVO

1D
-0.18%
1M
-6.80%
YTD
-10.74%
6M
-9.50%
1Y
-43.34%
3Y*
-15.59%
5Y*
2.92%
10Y*
7.56%

0941.HK

1D
-0.05%
1M
-2.65%
YTD
2.49%
6M
-3.17%
1Y
-0.25%
3Y*
15.93%
5Y*
18.81%
10Y*
5.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVO vs. 0941.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NVO
Novo Nordisk A/S
-10.74%-39.22%-15.93%54.84%22.66%63.52%23.33%28.70%-12.98%52.92%
0941.HK
China Mobile Ltd
2.49%13.01%27.03%34.46%20.82%12.60%-28.18%-8.82%-0.64%-1.09%

Correlation

The correlation between NVO and 0941.HK is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2007

0.07

The correlation between NVO and 0941.HK shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVO vs. 0941.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVO
NVO Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
NVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVO Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
NVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVO Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

0941.HK
0941.HK Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
0941.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0941.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
0941.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
0941.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
0941.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVO vs. 0941.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO) and China Mobile Ltd (0941.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NVO0941.HKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

1.01

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.80

-0.02

-0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.18

-0.04

-1.14

NVO vs. 0941.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVO Sharpe Ratio is -0.84, which is lower than the 0941.HK Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVO and 0941.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NVO vs. 0941.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVO drawdown since its inception was -74.70%, which is greater than 0941.HK's maximum drawdown of -65.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVO and 0941.HK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVO0941.HKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.70%

-65.26%

-9.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.34%

-13.36%

-40.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-74.70%

-13.36%

-61.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.70%

-16.97%

-57.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.70%

-49.33%

-25.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-68.11%

-5.88%

-62.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.79%

-31.80%

+14.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.62%

6.47%

+31.15%

Volatility

NVO vs. 0941.HK - Volatility Comparison

Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO) has a higher volatility of 10.68% compared to China Mobile Ltd (0941.HK) at 2.04%. This indicates that NVO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 0941.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVO0941.HKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.68%

2.04%

+8.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.04%

8.68%

+29.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.88%

11.28%

+40.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.33%

16.97%

+21.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.56%

20.29%

+12.27%

Dividends

NVO vs. 0941.HK - Dividend Comparison

NVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, less than 0941.HK's 6.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
0941.HK
China Mobile Ltd
6.44%6.41%6.53%7.16%8.95%7.24%7.36%4.45%4.52%3.62%3.27%3.32%
NVO
Novo Nordisk A/S
4.11%3.31%1.68%1.00%1.20%1.35%1.87%2.14%1.45%1.52%2.87%0.92%

Financials

NVO vs. 0941.HK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Novo Nordisk A/S and China Mobile Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. NVO values in DKK, 0941.HK values in HKD

Frequently Asked Questions


NVO and 0941.HK have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVO and 0941.HK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer