PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVIR vs. MEDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NVIR vs. MEDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF (NVIR) and Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF (MEDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NVIR vs. MEDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
NVIR
Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF
19.55%9.84%17.53%6.90%
MEDX
Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF
1.52%28.62%-4.68%-3.21%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVIR achieves a 19.55% return, which is significantly higher than MEDX's 1.52% return.


NVIR

1D
-2.96%
1M
-1.80%
YTD
19.55%
6M
20.43%
1Y
28.28%
3Y*
18.94%
5Y*
10Y*

MEDX

1D
1.19%
1M
-3.98%
YTD
1.52%
6M
8.07%
1Y
27.44%
3Y*
6.83%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NVIR vs. MEDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NVIR and MEDX have an expense ratio of 0.85%.


Return for Risk

NVIR vs. MEDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVIR
NVIR Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
NVIR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVIR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVIR Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
NVIR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVIR Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

MEDX
MEDX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
MEDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
MEDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVIR vs. MEDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF (NVIR) and Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF (MEDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVIRMEDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.28

1.30

-0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.69

1.87

-0.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.24

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

2.15

-0.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.18

6.85

+0.33

NVIR vs. MEDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVIR Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the MEDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVIR and MEDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVIRMEDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

1.30

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.30

+0.61

Correlation

The correlation between NVIR and MEDX is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

NVIR vs. MEDX - Dividend Comparison

NVIR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than MEDX's 1.21% yield.


TTM202520242023
NVIR
Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF
0.77%0.92%1.50%1.34%
MEDX
Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF
1.21%1.23%1.92%4.94%

Drawdowns

NVIR vs. MEDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVIR drawdown since its inception was -22.47%, roughly equal to the maximum MEDX drawdown of -23.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVIR and MEDX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NVIRMEDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.47%

-23.10%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.59%

-10.86%

-6.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.16%

-4.91%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.62%

-6.72%

+2.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.09%

3.40%

+0.69%

Volatility

NVIR vs. MEDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF (NVIR) is 4.94%, while Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF (MEDX) has a volatility of 6.14%. This indicates that NVIR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MEDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NVIRMEDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.94%

6.14%

-1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.09%

13.42%

-1.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.25%

21.48%

+0.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.33%

16.92%

+2.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.33%

16.92%

+2.41%