NVHE.TO vs. CBNK.TO
NVHE.TO (Harvest NVIDIA Enhanced High Income Shares ETF) and CBNK.TO (Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NVHE.TO returned 63.05% vs 79.20% for CBNK.TO. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NVHE.TO vs. CBNK.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVHE.TO achieves a 19.13% return, which is significantly lower than CBNK.TO's 25.56% return.
NVHE.TO
- 1D
- -3.24%
- 1M
- 10.90%
- YTD
- 19.13%
- 6M
- 22.99%
- 1Y
- 63.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBNK.TO
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 7.74%
- YTD
- 25.56%
- 6M
- 32.17%
- 1Y
- 79.20%
- 3Y*
- 38.97%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVHE.TO vs. CBNK.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NVHE.TO Harvest NVIDIA Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | 19.13% | 31.47% | 10.09% |
CBNK.TO Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF | 25.56% | 51.67% | 17.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVHE.TO and CBNK.TO is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2024 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVHE.TO vs. CBNK.TO — Risk / Return Rank
NVHE.TO
CBNK.TO
NVHE.TO vs. CBNK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest NVIDIA Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (NVHE.TO) and Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF (CBNK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NVHE.TO | CBNK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.87 | -0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 7.94 | -4.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.22 | 34.25 | -26.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NVHE.TO | CBNK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82 | 5.12 | -3.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 1.10 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
NVHE.TO vs. CBNK.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVHE.TO drawdown since its inception was -40.87%, which is greater than CBNK.TO's maximum drawdown of -32.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVHE.TO and CBNK.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVHE.TO | CBNK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.87% | -32.12% | -8.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.41% | -10.03% | -8.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.82% | -2.29% | -4.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.56% | -10.92% | +1.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.69% | 2.32% | +5.37% |
Volatility
NVHE.TO vs. CBNK.TO - Volatility Comparison
Harvest NVIDIA Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (NVHE.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.69% compared to Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF (CBNK.TO) at 5.67%. This indicates that NVHE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBNK.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVHE.TO | CBNK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.69% | 5.67% | +6.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.62% | 13.29% | +13.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.87% | 15.55% | +19.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.11% | 17.55% | +31.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.11% | 17.55% | +31.56% |
Dividends
NVHE.TO vs. CBNK.TO - Dividend Comparison
NVHE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.19%, more than CBNK.TO's 5.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBNK.TO Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF | 5.94% | 5.86% | 8.25% | 9.59% | 7.85% |
NVHE.TO Harvest NVIDIA Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | 21.19% | 21.62% | 7.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVHE.TO and CBNK.TO have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Harvest and Mulvihill.
Find the right allocation for NVHE.TO and CBNK.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer