PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVG vs. AITFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVG vs. AITFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Credit Income Fund (NVG) and Invesco Limited Term Municipal Income Fund (AITFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVG achieves a 2.27% return, which is significantly higher than AITFX's 0.81% return. Over the past 10 years, NVG has outperformed AITFX with an annualized return of 3.16%, while AITFX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.00% annualized return.


NVG

1D
-0.40%
1M
-2.83%
6M
0.14%
YTD
2.27%
1Y
13.77%
3Y*
8.98%
5Y*
-1.03%
10Y*
3.16%
ALL TIME*
5.24%

AITFX

1D
-0.18%
1M
-1.00%
6M
0.14%
YTD
0.81%
1Y
3.48%
3Y*
3.62%
5Y*
1.93%
10Y*
2.00%
ALL TIME*
4.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$6.06M$5.74M$6.29M

NVG vs. AITFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NVG
Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Credit Income Fund
2.27%11.61%10.79%1.94%-28.47%12.14%6.40%25.63%-4.03%13.19%
AITFX
Invesco Limited Term Municipal Income Fund
0.81%5.47%2.88%3.67%-2.62%0.57%3.73%4.35%1.13%2.69%

Correlation

The correlation between NVG and AITFX is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2002

0.30

The correlation between NVG and AITFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (all time) to 0.49 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVG vs. AITFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NVG
NVG Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
NVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVG Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
NVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVG Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

AITFX
AITFX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
AITFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AITFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
AITFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
AITFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
AITFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NVG vs. AITFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Credit Income Fund (NVG) and Invesco Limited Term Municipal Income Fund (AITFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NVGAITFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.67

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

2.49

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.34

8.79

-4.45

NVG vs. AITFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVG Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the AITFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVG and AITFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NVG vs. AITFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVG drawdown since its inception was -41.72%, which is greater than AITFX's maximum drawdown of -7.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVG and AITFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVGAITFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.72%

-7.17%

-34.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.44%

-1.62%

-8.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.34%

-2.28%

-12.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.58%

-5.62%

-34.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.58%

-7.17%

-33.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.79%

-1.00%

-6.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.91%

-0.73%

-7.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

0.46%

+2.94%

Volatility

NVG vs. AITFX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Credit Income Fund (NVG) has a higher volatility of 2.30% compared to Invesco Limited Term Municipal Income Fund (AITFX) at 0.51%. This indicates that NVG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AITFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVGAITFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.30%

0.51%

+1.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.87%

1.39%

+7.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.60%

1.72%

+8.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.08%

2.11%

+10.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.87%

2.19%

+10.68%

NVG vs. AITFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVG has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AITFX's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

NVG vs. AITFX - Dividend Comparison

NVG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.65%, more than AITFX's 3.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AITFX
Invesco Limited Term Municipal Income Fund
3.35%4.82%3.93%2.67%1.80%1.44%2.07%2.48%2.28%1.95%1.93%2.51%
NVG
Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Credit Income Fund
7.65%7.49%6.74%4.45%6.18%4.69%5.24%4.94%6.07%5.67%6.17%5.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


NVG and AITFX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVG has higher volatility (2.30%) compared to AITFX (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVG dropped -41.72% vs AITFX's -7.17%.

AITFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVG and AITFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer