PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDU vs. NVDS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVDU vs. NVDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU) and Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDU achieves a 19.93% return, which is significantly higher than NVDS's -25.38% return.


NVDU

1D
-7.30%
1M
14.13%
YTD
19.93%
6M
27.09%
1Y
84.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDS

1D
5.56%
1M
-13.17%
YTD
-25.38%
6M
-29.90%
1Y
-53.75%
3Y*
-64.56%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDU vs. NVDS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
NVDU
Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF
19.93%33.65%289.29%9.96%
NVDS
Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF
-25.38%-58.18%-80.03%-11.16%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDU and NVDS is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2023

-1.00

The correlation between NVDU and NVDS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -1.00 to -1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVDU vs. NVDS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDU
NVDU Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
NVDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDU Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDU Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDS
NVDS Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
NVDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDS Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDS Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDU vs. NVDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU) and Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVDUNVDSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.26

-1.06

+2.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.89

-1.66

+3.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

0.81

+0.41

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

-0.90

+2.92

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.60

-1.45

+6.05

NVDU vs. NVDS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDU Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is higher than the NVDS Sharpe Ratio of -1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDU and NVDS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVDUNVDSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

-1.06

+2.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.14

-1.02

+2.16

Drawdowns

NVDU vs. NVDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDU drawdown since its inception was -67.27%, smaller than the maximum NVDS drawdown of -99.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDU and NVDS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDUNVDSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.27%

-99.40%

+32.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.27%

-59.88%

+17.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-96.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.32%

-99.32%

+81.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.84%

-83.40%

+64.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.47%

37.07%

-18.60%

Volatility

NVDU vs. NVDS - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU) has a higher volatility of 24.74% compared to Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) at 19.37%. This indicates that NVDU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVDUNVDSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.74%

19.37%

+5.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.50%

38.64%

+11.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.02%

51.17%

+16.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

91.06%

68.88%

+22.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

91.06%

68.88%

+22.18%

NVDU vs. NVDS - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVDU has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDS's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

NVDU vs. NVDS - Dividend Comparison

NVDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, less than NVDS's 19.02% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
NVDS
Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF
19.02%14.19%14.11%14.69%5.72%
NVDU
Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF
4.83%5.68%16.85%0.63%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NVDU and NVDS have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDU has higher volatility (24.74%) compared to NVDS (19.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDU dropped -67.27% vs NVDS's -99.40%.

On 1-year performance, NVDU leads with 84.73% vs -53.75% for NVDS. On fees, NVDU is cheaper at 1.04% per year. On volatility, NVDS has been the lower-risk option at 19.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NVDU has performed better with a 84.73% return vs -53.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NVDU is cheaper with a 1.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for NVDS.

NVDS has the higher dividend yield at 19.02%, compared with 4.83% for NVDU.

NVDU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NVDS is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and AXS. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for NVDU and 1.15% for NVDS.

NVDU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVDU and NVDS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer