NVDS vs. YXI
NVDS (Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF) and YXI (ProShares Short FTSE China 50) are both Inverse Equities funds - NVDS tracks the NVIDIA Corporation (-125%) while YXI tracks the FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, NVDS returned -65.20%/yr vs -12.24%/yr for YXI. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NVDS charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for YXI.
Performance
NVDS vs. YXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVDS achieves a -29.31% return, which is significantly lower than YXI's 6.15% return.
NVDS
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- -17.63%
- YTD
- -29.31%
- 6M
- -32.74%
- 1Y
- -58.02%
- 3Y*
- -65.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YXI
- 1D
- -2.58%
- 1M
- 1.58%
- YTD
- 6.15%
- 6M
- 8.60%
- 1Y
- -3.19%
- 3Y*
- -12.24%
- 5Y*
- -3.21%
- 10Y*
- -8.43%
NVDS vs. YXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDS Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF | -29.31% | -58.18% | -80.03% | -83.15% | -14.84% |
YXI ProShares Short FTSE China 50 | 6.15% | -22.87% | -25.36% | 12.40% | 2.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDS and YXI is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2022 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVDS vs. YXI — Risk / Return Rank
NVDS
YXI
NVDS vs. YXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) and ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NVDS | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.14 | -0.16 | -0.98 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.91 | -0.09 | -1.82 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 0.99 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.97 | -0.24 | -0.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.53 | -0.42 | -1.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NVDS | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.14 | -0.16 | -0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.03 | -0.31 | -0.72 |
Drawdowns
NVDS vs. YXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDS drawdown since its inception was -99.40%, which is greater than YXI's maximum drawdown of -81.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDS and YXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDS | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.40% | -81.15% | -18.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.88% | -14.66% | -45.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -96.32% | -53.12% | -43.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -57.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -64.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.35% | -78.33% | -21.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -83.38% | -54.30% | -29.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.60% | 9.17% | +29.43% |
Volatility
NVDS vs. YXI - Volatility Comparison
Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) has a higher volatility of 18.32% compared to ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI) at 7.00%. This indicates that NVDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVDS | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.32% | 7.00% | +11.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.28% | 14.75% | +23.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.88% | 19.89% | +30.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.85% | 31.40% | +37.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.85% | 27.42% | +41.43% |
NVDS vs. YXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVDS has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than YXI's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVDS vs. YXI - Dividend Comparison
NVDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.07%, more than YXI's 2.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDS Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF | 20.07% | 14.19% | 14.11% | 14.69% | 5.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YXI ProShares Short FTSE China 50 | 2.89% | 3.60% | 4.35% | 2.66% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 1.01% | 0.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVDS and YXI have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDS has higher volatility (18.32%) compared to YXI (7.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDS dropped -99.40% vs YXI's -81.15%.
On 3-year performance, YXI leads with -12.24% vs -65.20% for NVDS. On fees, YXI is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, YXI has been the lower-risk option at 7.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, YXI has performed better with a -12.24% return vs -65.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
YXI is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for NVDS.
NVDS has the higher dividend yield at 20.07%, compared with 2.89% for YXI.
NVDS tracks NVIDIA Corporation (-125%), while YXI tracks FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-100%). They also come from different issuers: AXS and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for NVDS and 0.95% for YXI.
YXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.16 vs -1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVDS and YXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer