NVDS vs. TSDD
NVDS (Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF) and TSDD (GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. NVDS is passively managed, while TSDD is actively managed. Over the past year, NVDS returned -54.87% vs -64.48% for TSDD. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NVDS charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for TSDD.
Performance
NVDS vs. TSDD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVDS achieves a -27.67% return, which is significantly lower than TSDD's -1.81% return.
NVDS
- 1D
- -3.06%
- 1M
- -17.14%
- YTD
- -27.67%
- 6M
- -29.84%
- 1Y
- -54.87%
- 3Y*
- -64.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSDD
- 1D
- 2.57%
- 1M
- -16.78%
- YTD
- -1.81%
- 6M
- -2.21%
- 1Y
- -64.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDS vs. TSDD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDS Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF | -27.67% | -58.18% | -80.03% | -10.94% |
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | -1.81% | -74.84% | -89.21% | -20.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDS and TSDD is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2023 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVDS vs. TSDD — Risk / Return Rank
NVDS
TSDD
NVDS vs. TSDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) and GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NVDS | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 0.90 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | -0.85 | -0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.47 | -1.07 | -0.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NVDS | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.08 | -0.70 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.03 | -0.66 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
NVDS vs. TSDD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDS drawdown since its inception was -99.40%, roughly equal to the maximum TSDD drawdown of -99.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDS and TSDD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDS | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.40% | -99.03% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.88% | -76.12% | +16.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -96.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.34% | -98.88% | -0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -83.41% | -71.25% | -12.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.24% | 60.05% | -22.81% |
Volatility
NVDS vs. TSDD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) is 19.37%, while GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) has a volatility of 24.30%. This indicates that NVDS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVDS | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.37% | 24.30% | -4.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.74% | 54.96% | -16.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.09% | 92.61% | -41.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.86% | 114.39% | -45.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.86% | 114.39% | -45.53% |
NVDS vs. TSDD - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVDS has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than TSDD's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVDS vs. TSDD - Dividend Comparison
NVDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.62%, more than TSDD's 8.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDS Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF | 19.62% | 14.19% | 14.11% | 14.69% | 5.72% |
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | 8.58% | 8.42% | 0.00% | 24.84% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVDS and TSDD have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSDD has higher volatility (24.30%) compared to NVDS (19.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDS dropped -99.40% vs TSDD's -99.03%.
On 1-year performance, NVDS leads with -54.87% vs -64.48% for TSDD. On fees, NVDS is cheaper at 1.15% per year. On volatility, NVDS has been the lower-risk option at 19.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NVDS has performed better with a -54.87% return vs -64.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NVDS is cheaper with a 1.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TSDD.
NVDS has the higher dividend yield at 19.62%, compared with 8.58% for TSDD.
They also come from different issuers: AXS and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for NVDS and 1.50% for TSDD.
TSDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.70 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVDS and TSDD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer