NVDS vs. SHRT
NVDS (Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF) and SHRT (Gotham Short Strategies ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. NVDS is passively managed, while SHRT is actively managed. Over the past year, NVDS returned -58.02% vs -22.30% for SHRT. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NVDS charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for SHRT.
Performance
NVDS vs. SHRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVDS achieves a -29.31% return, which is significantly lower than SHRT's -17.46% return.
NVDS
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- -17.63%
- YTD
- -29.31%
- 6M
- -32.74%
- 1Y
- -58.02%
- 3Y*
- -65.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SHRT
- 1D
- -1.72%
- 1M
- -4.33%
- YTD
- -17.46%
- 6M
- -16.25%
- 1Y
- -22.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDS vs. SHRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDS Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF | -29.31% | -58.18% | -80.03% | -9.39% |
SHRT Gotham Short Strategies ETF | -17.46% | -0.91% | -1.44% | -5.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDS and SHRT is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2023 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVDS vs. SHRT — Risk / Return Rank
NVDS
SHRT
NVDS vs. SHRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) and Gotham Short Strategies ETF (SHRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NVDS | SHRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.14 | -1.72 | +0.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.91 | -2.55 | +0.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 0.73 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.97 | -0.99 | +0.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.53 | -2.18 | +0.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NVDS | SHRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.14 | -1.72 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.03 | -0.80 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
NVDS vs. SHRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDS drawdown since its inception was -99.40%, which is greater than SHRT's maximum drawdown of -25.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDS and SHRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDS | SHRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.40% | -25.98% | -73.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.88% | -22.73% | -37.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -96.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.35% | -25.98% | -73.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -83.38% | -8.09% | -75.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.60% | 10.30% | +28.30% |
Volatility
NVDS vs. SHRT - Volatility Comparison
Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) has a higher volatility of 18.32% compared to Gotham Short Strategies ETF (SHRT) at 4.26%. This indicates that NVDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVDS | SHRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.32% | 4.26% | +14.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.28% | 10.99% | +27.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.88% | 13.04% | +37.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.85% | 12.78% | +56.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.85% | 12.78% | +56.07% |
NVDS vs. SHRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVDS has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SHRT's 1.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVDS vs. SHRT - Dividend Comparison
NVDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.07%, more than SHRT's 0.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDS Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF | 20.07% | 14.19% | 14.11% | 14.69% | 5.72% |
SHRT Gotham Short Strategies ETF | 0.08% | 0.07% | 0.85% | 0.27% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVDS and SHRT have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDS has higher volatility (18.32%) compared to SHRT (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDS dropped -99.40% vs SHRT's -25.98%.
On 1-year performance, SHRT leads with -22.30% vs -58.02% for NVDS. On fees, NVDS is cheaper at 1.15% per year. On volatility, SHRT has been the lower-risk option at 4.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SHRT has performed better with a -22.30% return vs -58.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NVDS is cheaper with a 1.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for SHRT.
NVDS has the higher dividend yield at 20.07%, compared with 0.08% for SHRT.
They also come from different issuers: AXS and Gotham. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for NVDS and 1.35% for SHRT.
NVDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.14 vs -1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVDS and SHRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer