NVDS vs. QQQD
NVDS (Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF) and QQQD (Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds - NVDS tracks the NVIDIA Corporation (-125%) while QQQD tracks the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, NVDS returned -35.38% vs -17.22% for QQQD. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. NVDS charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for QQQD.
Performance
NVDS vs. QQQD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVDS achieves a -24.21% return, which is significantly lower than QQQD's -3.21% return.
NVDS
- 1D
- -4.24%
- 1M
- -10.37%
- 6M
- -24.26%
- YTD
- -24.21%
- 1Y
- -35.38%
- 3Y*
- -62.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -68.81%
QQQD
- 1D
- -3.65%
- 1M
- -5.05%
- 6M
- -3.32%
- YTD
- -3.21%
- 1Y
- -17.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -21.57%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.22M | $5.62M | $7.37M | |
| $1.19M | $1.24M | $1.71M |
NVDS vs. QQQD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NVDS Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF | -24.21% | -58.18% | -56.18% |
QQQD Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares | -3.21% | -20.32% | -27.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDS and QQQD is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024 | 0.69 |
The correlation between NVDS and QQQD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVDS vs. QQQD — Risk / Return Rank
NVDS
QQQD
NVDS vs. QQQD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) and Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NVDS | QQQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 0.89 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.75 | -0.79 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.44 | -1.37 | -0.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NVDS vs. QQQD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDS drawdown since its inception was -99.40%, which is greater than QQQD's maximum drawdown of -49.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDS and QQQD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDS | QQQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.40% | -49.47% | -49.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.10% | -21.94% | -25.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -95.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.31% | -47.67% | -51.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -84.02% | -31.29% | -52.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.60% | 13.25% | +11.35% |
Volatility
NVDS vs. QQQD - Volatility Comparison
Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) has a higher volatility of 18.42% compared to Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD) at 8.82%. This indicates that NVDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVDS | QQQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.42% | 8.82% | +9.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.03% | 17.95% | +25.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.77% | 22.54% | +32.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.61% | 27.02% | +41.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.61% | 27.02% | +41.59% |
NVDS vs. QQQD - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVDS has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQD's 0.57% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVDS vs. QQQD - Dividend Comparison
NVDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.72%, more than QQQD's 3.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDS Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF | 18.72% | 14.19% | 14.11% | 14.69% | 5.72% |
QQQD Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares | 3.18% | 4.33% | 5.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVDS and QQQD have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDS has higher volatility (18.42%) compared to QQQD (8.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDS dropped -99.40% vs QQQD's -49.47%.
On 1-year performance, QQQD leads with -17.22% vs -35.38% for NVDS. On fees, QQQD is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, QQQD has been the lower-risk option at 8.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQQD has performed better with a -17.22% return vs -35.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQD is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for NVDS.
NVDS has the higher dividend yield at 18.72%, compared with 3.18% for QQQD.
NVDS tracks NVIDIA Corporation (-125%), while QQQD tracks Indxx Magnificent 7 Index (-100%). They also come from different issuers: AXS and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for NVDS and 0.57% for QQQD.
NVDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.65 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVDS and QQQD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer