PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDS vs. NVDU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVDS vs. NVDU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) and Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDS achieves a -29.31% return, which is significantly lower than NVDU's 29.37% return.


NVDS

1D
1.18%
1M
-17.63%
YTD
-29.31%
6M
-32.74%
1Y
-58.02%
3Y*
-65.20%
5Y*
10Y*

NVDU

1D
-1.47%
1M
23.27%
YTD
29.37%
6M
34.58%
1Y
110.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDS vs. NVDU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
NVDS
Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF
-29.31%-58.18%-80.03%-11.16%
NVDU
Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF
29.37%33.65%289.29%9.96%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDS and NVDU is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2023

-1.00

The correlation between NVDS and NVDU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -1.00 to -1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVDS vs. NVDU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDS
NVDS Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
NVDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDS Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDS Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDU
NVDU Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
NVDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDU Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDU Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDS vs. NVDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) and Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVDSNVDUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.14

1.64

-2.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.91

2.21

-4.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.79

1.27

-0.48

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.97

2.80

-3.77

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.53

6.42

-7.95

NVDS vs. NVDU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDS Sharpe Ratio is -1.14, which is lower than the NVDU Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDS and NVDU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVDSNVDUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.14

1.64

-2.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.03

1.21

-2.24

Drawdowns

NVDS vs. NVDU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDS drawdown since its inception was -99.40%, which is greater than NVDU's maximum drawdown of -67.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDS and NVDU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDSNVDUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.40%

-67.27%

-32.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.88%

-42.27%

-17.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-96.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.35%

-11.89%

-87.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-83.38%

-18.84%

-64.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.60%

18.44%

+20.16%

Volatility

NVDS vs. NVDU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) is 18.32%, while Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU) has a volatility of 23.20%. This indicates that NVDS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVDSNVDUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.32%

23.20%

-4.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.28%

49.98%

-11.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.88%

67.67%

-16.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

68.85%

91.00%

-22.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.85%

91.00%

-22.15%

NVDS vs. NVDU - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVDS has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDU's 1.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

NVDS vs. NVDU - Dividend Comparison

NVDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.07%, more than NVDU's 4.48% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
NVDS
Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF
20.07%14.19%14.11%14.69%5.72%
NVDU
Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF
4.48%5.68%16.85%0.63%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NVDS and NVDU have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDU has higher volatility (23.20%) compared to NVDS (18.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDS dropped -99.40% vs NVDU's -67.27%.

On 1-year performance, NVDU leads with 110.52% vs -58.02% for NVDS. On fees, NVDU is cheaper at 1.04% per year. On volatility, NVDS has been the lower-risk option at 18.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NVDU has performed better with a 110.52% return vs -58.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NVDU is cheaper with a 1.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for NVDS.

NVDS has the higher dividend yield at 20.07%, compared with 4.48% for NVDU.

NVDS is categorized as Inverse Equities, while NVDU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: AXS and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for NVDS and 1.04% for NVDU.

NVDU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs -1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVDS and NVDU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer