NVDL vs. TSMG
NVDL (GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF) and TSMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NVDL returned 90.12% vs 292.24% for TSMG. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NVDL charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for TSMG.
Performance
NVDL vs. TSMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVDL achieves a 24.36% return, which is significantly lower than TSMG's 92.52% return.
NVDL
- 1D
- 3.68%
- 1M
- 21.13%
- YTD
- 24.36%
- 6M
- 26.69%
- 1Y
- 90.12%
- 3Y*
- 113.21%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSMG
- 1D
- 3.47%
- 1M
- 24.82%
- YTD
- 92.52%
- 6M
- 104.85%
- 1Y
- 292.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDL vs. TSMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NVDL GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF | 24.36% | 39.45% |
TSMG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF | 92.52% | 76.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDL and TSMG is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2025 | 0.63 |
The correlation between NVDL and TSMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVDL vs. TSMG — Risk / Return Rank
NVDL
TSMG
NVDL vs. TSMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NVDL | TSMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.45 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | 8.34 | -6.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.91 | 27.23 | -22.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NVDL | TSMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | 4.11 | -2.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.80 | 1.76 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
NVDL vs. TSMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDL drawdown since its inception was -67.55%, which is greater than TSMG's maximum drawdown of -63.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDL and TSMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDL | TSMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.55% | -63.67% | -3.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.23% | -35.29% | -6.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.19% | -0.93% | -14.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.96% | -16.94% | -0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.41% | 10.79% | +7.62% |
Volatility
NVDL vs. TSMG - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL) has a higher volatility of 24.75% compared to Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG) at 22.71%. This indicates that NVDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVDL | TSMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.75% | 22.71% | +2.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.90% | 55.10% | -4.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.08% | 71.76% | -3.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 90.39% | 80.99% | +9.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 90.39% | 80.99% | +9.40% |
NVDL vs. TSMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVDL has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than TSMG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVDL vs. TSMG - Dividend Comparison
NVDL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.96%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDL GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.29% |
TSMG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF | 5.96% | 11.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVDL and TSMG have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDL has higher volatility (24.75%) compared to TSMG (22.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDL dropped -67.55% vs TSMG's -63.67%.
On 1-year performance, TSMG leads with 292.24% vs 90.12% for NVDL. On fees, TSMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, TSMG has been the lower-risk option at 22.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSMG has performed better with a 292.24% return vs 90.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NVDL.
TSMG has the higher dividend yield at 5.96%, compared with 0.00% for NVDL.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for NVDL and 0.75% for TSMG.
TSMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.11 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVDL and TSMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer