PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDD.L vs. 3QQQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NVDD.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in IncomeShares NVIDIA (NVDA) Options ETP GBP (NVDD.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NVDD.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NVDD.L
IncomeShares NVIDIA (NVDA) Options ETP GBP
-14.11%-22.81%3.90%
3QQQ.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities
-17.76%5.78%16.02%
Different Trading Currencies

NVDD.L is traded in GBp, while 3QQQ.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the 3QQQ.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDD.L achieves a -14.11% return, which is significantly higher than 3QQQ.L's -17.76% return.


NVDD.L

1D
-1.18%
1M
-2.42%
YTD
-14.11%
6M
-18.25%
1Y
-5.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

3QQQ.L

1D
8.47%
1M
-9.75%
YTD
-17.76%
6M
-15.54%
1Y
32.90%
3Y*
35.59%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NVDD.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVDD.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than 3QQQ.L's 0.01% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NVDD.L vs. 3QQQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDD.L
NVDD.L Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
NVDD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

3QQQ.L
3QQQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
3QQQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDD.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares NVIDIA (NVDA) Options ETP GBP (NVDD.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVDD.L3QQQ.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.10

0.47

-0.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.24

1.19

-0.95

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.17

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.16

0.67

-0.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.29

1.48

-1.77

NVDD.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDD.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.10, which is lower than the 3QQQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDD.L and 3QQQ.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVDD.L3QQQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

0.47

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.39

0.25

-0.64

Correlation

The correlation between NVDD.L and 3QQQ.L is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

NVDD.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither NVDD.L nor 3QQQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

NVDD.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDD.L drawdown since its inception was -44.37%, smaller than the maximum 3QQQ.L drawdown of -58.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDD.L and 3QQQ.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDD.L3QQQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.37%

-58.93%

+14.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.58%

-47.89%

+6.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.96%

-42.24%

+1.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.99%

-20.85%

-1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.65%

21.13%

+1.52%

Volatility

NVDD.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IncomeShares NVIDIA (NVDA) Options ETP GBP (NVDD.L) is 6.75%, while Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L) has a volatility of 16.66%. This indicates that NVDD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3QQQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NVDD.L3QQQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.75%

16.66%

-9.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.15%

53.57%

-6.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.49%

70.31%

-15.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.75%

63.16%

-12.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.75%

63.16%

-12.41%