PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDA vs. UGL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVDA vs. UGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and ProShares Ultra Gold (UGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDA achieves a 10.16% return, which is significantly higher than UGL's -12.66% return. Over the past 10 years, NVDA has outperformed UGL with an annualized return of 67.95%, while UGL has yielded a comparatively lower 16.37% annualized return.


NVDA

1D
0.16%
1M
-9.03%
YTD
10.16%
6M
17.38%
1Y
41.70%
3Y*
71.13%
5Y*
63.13%
10Y*
67.95%

UGL

1D
0.08%
1M
-20.27%
YTD
-12.66%
6M
-12.99%
1Y
32.76%
3Y*
47.90%
5Y*
24.60%
10Y*
16.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDA vs. UGL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
10.16%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%
UGL
ProShares Ultra Gold
-12.66%137.57%46.36%15.56%-7.59%-12.30%39.04%31.11%-8.02%22.50%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDA and UGL is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2008

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVDA vs. UGL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

UGL
UGL Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
UGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGL Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
UGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGL Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDA vs. UGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and ProShares Ultra Gold (UGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NVDAUGLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.16

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

0.71

+1.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.94

1.85

+3.09

NVDA vs. UGL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDA Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is higher than the UGL Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDA and UGL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NVDA vs. UGL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDA drawdown since its inception was -89.72%, which is greater than UGL's maximum drawdown of -75.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDA and UGL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDAUGLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.72%

-75.93%

-13.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.21%

-46.64%

+26.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.88%

-46.64%

+9.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.34%

-46.64%

-19.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.34%

-46.64%

-19.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.86%

-43.37%

+30.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.18%

-43.62%

+7.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.46%

17.76%

-9.30%

Volatility

NVDA vs. UGL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is 13.26%, while ProShares Ultra Gold (UGL) has a volatility of 15.51%. This indicates that NVDA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVDAUGLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.26%

15.51%

-2.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.67%

48.64%

-21.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.00%

54.39%

-19.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.76%

36.61%

+15.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.84%

32.58%

+17.26%

Dividends

NVDA vs. UGL - Dividend Comparison

NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, while UGL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%
UGL
ProShares Ultra Gold
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NVDA and UGL have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UGL has higher volatility (15.51%) compared to NVDA (13.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDA dropped -89.72% vs UGL's -75.93%.

NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVDA and UGL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer