PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDA vs. SPMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVDA vs. SPMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF (SPMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDA achieves a 11.77% return, which is significantly lower than SPMD's 13.50% return. Over the past 10 years, NVDA has outperformed SPMD with an annualized return of 68.44%, while SPMD has yielded a comparatively lower 11.43% annualized return.


NVDA

1D
-0.22%
1M
-3.14%
YTD
11.77%
6M
12.69%
1Y
46.17%
3Y*
75.23%
5Y*
64.35%
10Y*
68.44%

SPMD

1D
0.82%
1M
0.99%
YTD
13.50%
6M
13.79%
1Y
23.67%
3Y*
15.34%
5Y*
8.06%
10Y*
11.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDA vs. SPMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
11.77%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%
SPMD
SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF
13.50%7.44%13.91%16.48%-13.13%24.76%13.46%25.19%-10.34%15.12%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDA and SPMD is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2005

0.50

Over the past year, the correlation between NVDA and SPMD has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVDA vs. SPMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMD
SPMD Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SPMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMD Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMD Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDA vs. SPMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF (SPMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVDASPMDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.27

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

2.68

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.56

9.83

-4.27

NVDA vs. SPMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDA Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the SPMD Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDA and SPMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVDASPMDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

1.52

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.25

0.41

+0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.38

0.54

+0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.45

+0.17

Drawdowns

NVDA vs. SPMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDA drawdown since its inception was -89.72%, which is greater than SPMD's maximum drawdown of -57.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDA and SPMD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDASPMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.72%

-57.62%

-32.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.21%

-8.86%

-11.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.88%

-24.08%

-12.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.34%

-24.08%

-42.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.34%

-41.86%

-24.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.58%

-0.91%

-10.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.19%

-8.11%

-28.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.33%

2.41%

+5.92%

Volatility

NVDA vs. SPMD - Volatility Comparison

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a higher volatility of 13.01% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF (SPMD) at 4.21%. This indicates that NVDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVDASPMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.01%

4.21%

+8.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.36%

11.55%

+14.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.74%

15.65%

+19.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.75%

19.72%

+32.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.85%

21.18%

+28.67%

Dividends

NVDA vs. SPMD - Dividend Comparison

NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than SPMD's 1.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%
SPMD
SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF
1.23%1.39%1.42%1.47%1.64%1.24%1.30%1.57%1.85%1.97%2.13%5.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


NVDA and SPMD have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDA has higher volatility (13.01%) compared to SPMD (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDA dropped -89.72% vs SPMD's -57.62%.

SPMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVDA and SPMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer