PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
NVDA vs. GBPG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

NVDA vs. GBPG.L

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) is a stock, while GBPG.L (Goldman Sachs Access UK Gilts 1-10 Years UCITS ETF Class GBP (Dist)) is European Government Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP. Over the past 3 years, NVDA returned 71.13%/yr vs 6.35%/yr for GBPG.L. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

NVDA vs. GBPG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and Goldman Sachs Access UK Gilts 1-10 Years UCITS ETF Class GBP (Dist) (GBPG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

NVDA is traded in USD, while GBPG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GBPG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDA achieves a 10.16% return, which is significantly higher than GBPG.L's 2.95% return.

NVDA

1D
0.16%
1M
-8.83%
YTD
10.16%
6M
17.38%
1Y
44.72%
3Y*
71.13%
5Y*
63.13%
10Y*
67.95%

GBPG.L

1D
0.12%
1M
1.02%
YTD
2.95%
6M
0.82%
1Y
1.63%
3Y*
6.35%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDA vs. GBPG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation		10.16%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%28.77%
GBPG.L
Goldman Sachs Access UK Gilts 1-10 Years UCITS ETF Class GBP (Dist)		2.95%9.95%-1.50%9.78%-18.86%-2.95%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDA and GBPG.L is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2021

0.20

The correlation between NVDA and GBPG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

NVIDIA Corporation

Goldman Sachs Access UK Gilts 1-10 Years UCITS ETF Class GBP (Dist)

Often compared with NVDA:
NVDA vs. AMDNVDA vs. AAPLNVDA vs. AVGONVDA vs. TSMNVDA vs. SPYNVDA vs. AMZNNVDA vs. QQQ
Often compared with GBPG.L:
GBPG.L vs. INXG.LGBPG.L vs. GLTS.LGBPG.L vs. GLTA.LGBPG.L vs. BHMG.LGBPG.L vs. GLTL.LGBPG.L vs. TRIGXGBPG.L vs. GLTY.L

Return for Risk

NVDA vs. GBPG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
GBPG.L
GBPG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
GBPG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBPG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBPG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
GBPG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBPG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDA vs. GBPG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and Goldman Sachs Access UK Gilts 1-10 Years UCITS ETF Class GBP (Dist) (GBPG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

NVDAGBPG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.20
0.09

+1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.75
0.20

+1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.02

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

0.15

+1.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.94

0.34

+4.60

NVDA vs. GBPG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDA Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is higher than the GBPG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDA and GBPG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NVDA vs. GBPG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDA drawdown since its inception was -89.72%, which is greater than GBPG.L's maximum drawdown of -34.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDA and GBPG.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

NVDAGBPG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.72%

-34.02%

-55.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.21%

-5.89%

-14.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.88%

-11.44%

-25.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.34%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.34%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.86%

-3.96%

-8.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.18%

-12.52%

-23.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.46%

2.59%

+5.87%

Volatility

NVDA vs. GBPG.L - Volatility Comparison

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a higher volatility of 13.26% compared to Goldman Sachs Access UK Gilts 1-10 Years UCITS ETF Class GBP (Dist) (GBPG.L) at 2.47%. This indicates that NVDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBPG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

NVDAGBPG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.26%

2.47%

+10.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.67%

7.65%

+19.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.00%

9.53%

+25.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.76%

10.74%

+41.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.84%

10.74%

+39.10%

Dividends

NVDA vs. GBPG.L - Dividend Comparison

NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than GBPG.L's 4.08% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GBPG.L
Goldman Sachs Access UK Gilts 1-10 Years UCITS ETF Class GBP (Dist)		4.08%4.13%4.10%3.35%0.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation		0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

NVDA and GBPG.L have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVDA and GBPG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer