NVDA vs. FXF

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) is a stock, while FXF (Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust) is Currency fund tracking the Swiss Franc. Over the past 10 years, NVDA returned 65.23%/yr vs 1.16%/yr for FXF. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

NVDA vs. FXF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust (FXF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDA achieves a 9.13% return, which is significantly higher than FXF's -2.51% return. Over the past 10 years, NVDA has outperformed FXF with an annualized return of 65.23%, while FXF has yielded a comparatively lower 1.16% annualized return.

NVDA

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: -3.52%
• 6M: 9.29%
• YTD: 9.13%
• 1Y: 18.06%
• 3Y*: 66.27%
• 5Y*: 60.07%
• 10Y*: 65.23%
• ALL TIME*: 36.39%

FXF

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: -0.69%
• 6M: -1.20%
• YTD: -2.51%
• 1Y: -1.57%
• 3Y*: 1.94%
• 5Y*: 1.98%
• 10Y*: 1.16%
• ALL TIME*: 1.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDA vs. FXF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	9.13%	38.92%	171.25%	239.02%	-50.26%	125.48%	122.30%	76.94%	-30.82%	81.99%
FXF Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust	-2.51%	14.04%	-7.46%	9.63%	-2.29%	-4.08%	8.18%	0.32%	-2.01%	3.31%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDA and FXF is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.03
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2006	0.02

The correlation between NVDA and FXF shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.08 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NVDA vs. FXF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDA

NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 61
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 56
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 64

FXF

FXF Risk / Return Rank: 7
FXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
FXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
FXF Omega Ratio Rank: 7
FXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
FXF Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDA vs. FXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust (FXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NVDA	FXF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.51	-0.21	+0.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.95	-0.26	+1.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	0.97	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.90	-0.24	+1.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.90	-0.55	+2.45

NVDA vs. FXF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDA Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is higher than the FXF Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDA and FXF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NVDA vs. FXF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDA drawdown since its inception was -89.72%, which is greater than FXF's maximum drawdown of -35.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDA and FXF.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVDA	FXF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.72%	-35.58%	-54.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.21%	-6.72%	-13.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.88%	-8.52%	-28.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.34%	-11.99%	-54.35%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-66.34%	-15.04%	-51.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.67%	-20.42%	+6.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.10%	-20.83%	-15.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.50%	2.88%	+6.62%

Volatility

NVDA vs. FXF - Volatility Comparison

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a higher volatility of 10.95% compared to Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust (FXF) at 1.86%. This indicates that NVDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVDA	FXF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.95%	1.86%	+9.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.74%	5.76%	+21.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.88%	7.44%	+28.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.81%	8.32%	+43.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.92%	7.57%	+42.35%

Dividends

NVDA vs. FXF - Dividend Comparison

NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, while FXF has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FXF Invesco CurrencyShares® Swiss Franc Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.03%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	0.14%	0.02%	0.03%	0.03%	0.11%	0.05%	0.12%	0.27%	0.46%	0.29%	0.45%	1.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVDA and FXF in my portfolio?

NVDA and FXF have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NVDA or FXF?

NVDA has higher volatility (10.95%) compared to FXF (1.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDA dropped -89.72% vs FXF's -35.58%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.51 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.