PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDA vs. BYRN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NVDA vs. BYRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDA achieves a 13.25% return, which is significantly higher than BYRN's -76.98% return. Over the past 10 years, NVDA has outperformed BYRN with an annualized return of 66.42%, while BYRN has yielded a comparatively lower 4.88% annualized return.


NVDA

1D
4.03%
1M
2.97%
6M
14.26%
YTD
13.25%
1Y
28.09%
3Y*
70.82%
5Y*
60.22%
10Y*
66.42%

BYRN

1D
-1.90%
1M
-40.08%
6M
-77.79%
YTD
-76.98%
1Y
-83.17%
3Y*
-1.63%
5Y*
-28.95%
10Y*
4.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDA vs. BYRN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
13.25%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%
BYRN
Byrna Technologies Inc.
-76.98%-41.72%350.86%-18.49%-41.27%-7.93%663.16%26.67%7.14%-30.00%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDA and BYRN is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2011

0.10

The correlation between NVDA and BYRN shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NVDA:

$5.11T

BYRN:

$87.68M

EPS

NVDA:

$6.53

BYRN:

-$0.16

PS Ratio

NVDA:

20.36

BYRN:

0.84

PB Ratio

NVDA:

26.32

BYRN:

1.54

Total Revenue (TTM)

NVDA:

$253.49B

BYRN:

$108.86M

Gross Profit (TTM)

NVDA:

$187.95B

BYRN:

$57.17M

EBITDA (TTM)

NVDA:

$192.76B

BYRN:

-$3.55M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVDA vs. BYRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

BYRN
BYRN Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BYRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BYRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BYRN Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BYRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BYRN Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDA vs. BYRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NVDABYRNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

0.69

+0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

-0.99

+2.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.09

-1.65

+4.75

NVDA vs. BYRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDA Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is higher than the BYRN Sharpe Ratio of -1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDA and BYRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NVDA vs. BYRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDA drawdown since its inception was -89.72%, roughly equal to the maximum BYRN drawdown of -92.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDA and BYRN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDABYRNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.72%

-92.51%

+2.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.21%

-86.01%

+65.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.88%

-88.70%

+51.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.34%

-92.51%

+26.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.34%

-92.51%

+26.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.41%

-88.70%

+78.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.12%

-52.50%

+16.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.32%

51.63%

-42.31%

Volatility

NVDA vs. BYRN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is 10.90%, while Byrna Technologies Inc. (BYRN) has a volatility of 46.46%. This indicates that NVDA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BYRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVDABYRNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.90%

46.46%

-35.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.21%

74.13%

-46.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.49%

82.31%

-46.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.83%

75.22%

-23.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.87%

96.16%

-46.29%

Dividends

NVDA vs. BYRN - Dividend Comparison

NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, while BYRN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BYRN
Byrna Technologies Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.13%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Financials

NVDA vs. BYRN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NVIDIA Corporation and Byrna Technologies Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
81.62B
16.39M
(NVDA) Total Revenue
(BYRN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NVDA vs. BYRN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between NVIDIA Corporation and Byrna Technologies Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
74.9%
10.9%
Portfolio components
NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.

BYRN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Byrna Technologies Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.78M and revenue of 16.39M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.9%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.

BYRN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Byrna Technologies Inc. reported an operating income of -12.85M and revenue of 16.39M, resulting in an operating margin of -78.4%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.

BYRN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Byrna Technologies Inc. reported a net income of -10.09M and revenue of 16.39M, resulting in a net margin of -61.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NVDA and BYRN have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BYRN has higher volatility (46.46%) compared to NVDA (10.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDA dropped -89.72% vs BYRN's -92.51%.

NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVDA and BYRN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer