PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDA.NEO vs. MRVL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

NVDA.NEO vs. MRVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in NVIDIA Corporation CDR (NVDA.NEO) and Marvell Technology Group Ltd. (MRVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NVDA.NEO vs. MRVL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
NVDA.NEO
NVIDIA Corporation CDR
-6.35%34.83%167.17%233.75%-46.70%
MRVL
Marvell Technology Group Ltd.
27.25%-26.36%99.58%60.08%-43.46%
Different Trading Currencies

NVDA.NEO is traded in CAD, while MRVL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MRVL values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NVDA.NEO:

CA$963.21B

MRVL:

$91.37B

EPS

NVDA.NEO:

CA$4.07

MRVL:

$3.08

PE Ratio

NVDA.NEO:

9.73

MRVL:

34.69

PS Ratio

NVDA.NEO:

5.16

MRVL:

11.30

PB Ratio

NVDA.NEO:

8.10

MRVL:

6.39

Total Revenue (TTM)

NVDA.NEO:

CA$187.14B

MRVL:

$8.19B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NVDA.NEO:

CA$131.09B

MRVL:

$4.18B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDA.NEO achieves a -6.35% return, which is significantly lower than MRVL's 27.25% return.


NVDA.NEO

1D
0.81%
1M
-4.01%
YTD
-6.35%
6M
-7.41%
1Y
55.83%
3Y*
81.15%
5Y*
10Y*

MRVL

1D
7.58%
1M
34.12%
YTD
27.25%
6M
27.02%
1Y
65.98%
3Y*
36.83%
5Y*
19.42%
10Y*
28.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVDA.NEO vs. MRVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDA.NEO
NVDA.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
NVDA.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

MRVL
MRVL Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
MRVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRVL Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
MRVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRVL Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDA.NEO vs. MRVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVIDIA Corporation CDR (NVDA.NEO) and Marvell Technology Group Ltd. (MRVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVDA.NEOMRVLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.41

1.04

+0.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.10

1.71

+0.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.23

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

2.44

+0.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.94

5.26

+1.67

NVDA.NEO vs. MRVL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDA.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is higher than the MRVL Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDA.NEO and MRVL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVDA.NEOMRVLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

1.04

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.09

0.39

+0.70

Correlation

The correlation between NVDA.NEO and MRVL is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

NVDA.NEO vs. MRVL - Dividend Comparison

NVDA.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than MRVL's 0.22% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVDA.NEO
NVIDIA Corporation CDR
0.03%0.03%0.03%0.04%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MRVL
Marvell Technology Group Ltd.
0.22%0.28%0.22%0.40%0.65%0.21%0.50%0.90%1.48%1.12%1.73%2.72%

Drawdowns

NVDA.NEO vs. MRVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDA.NEO drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, smaller than the maximum MRVL drawdown of -68.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDA.NEO and MRVL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDA.NEOMRVLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.15%

-91.60%

+30.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.04%

-26.36%

+5.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.13%

-15.07%

-1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.99%

-47.08%

+31.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.44%

12.14%

-3.70%

Volatility

NVDA.NEO vs. MRVL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NVIDIA Corporation CDR (NVDA.NEO) is 10.01%, while Marvell Technology Group Ltd. (MRVL) has a volatility of 25.05%. This indicates that NVDA.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRVL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NVDA.NEOMRVLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.01%

25.05%

-15.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.74%

40.55%

-15.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.81%

64.06%

-24.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.59%

57.00%

-5.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.59%

48.71%

+2.88%

Financials

NVDA.NEO vs. MRVL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NVIDIA Corporation CDR and Marvell Technology Group Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
57.01B
2.22B
(NVDA.NEO) Total Revenue
(MRVL) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. NVDA.NEO values in CAD, MRVL values in USD

NVDA.NEO vs. MRVL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between NVIDIA Corporation CDR and Marvell Technology Group Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
73.4%
51.7%
Portfolio components
NVDA.NEO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, NVIDIA Corporation CDR reported a gross profit of 41.85B and revenue of 57.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.4%.

MRVL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Marvell Technology Group Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.15B and revenue of 2.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.7%.

NVDA.NEO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, NVIDIA Corporation CDR reported an operating income of 36.01B and revenue of 57.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 63.2%.

MRVL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Marvell Technology Group Ltd. reported an operating income of 404.40M and revenue of 2.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.2%.

NVDA.NEO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, NVIDIA Corporation CDR reported a net income of 31.91B and revenue of 57.01B, resulting in a net margin of 56.0%.

MRVL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Marvell Technology Group Ltd. reported a net income of 396.10M and revenue of 2.22B, resulting in a net margin of 17.9%.