NVDA.NEO vs. MRVL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NVDA.NEO (NVIDIA Corporation CDR) and MRVL (Marvell Technology Group Ltd.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Semiconductors industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 3 years, NVDA.NEO returned 72.40%/yr vs 73.71%/yr for MRVL. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

NVDA.NEO vs. MRVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in NVIDIA Corporation CDR (NVDA.NEO) and Marvell Technology Group Ltd. (MRVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

NVDA.NEO is traded in CAD, while MRVL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MRVL values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDA.NEO achieves a 14.04% return, which is significantly lower than MRVL's 259.92% return.

NVDA.NEO

• 1D: -3.75%
• 1M: 7.75%
• YTD: 14.04%
• 6M: 18.04%
• 1Y: 48.36%
• 3Y*: 72.40%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MRVL

• 1D: 4.16%
• 1M: 87.99%
• YTD: 259.92%
• 6M: 200.25%
• 1Y: 391.29%
• 3Y*: 73.71%
• 5Y*: 48.70%
• 10Y*: 42.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDA.NEO vs. MRVL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
NVDA.NEO NVIDIA Corporation CDR	14.04%	34.83%	167.17%	233.75%	-46.70%
MRVL Marvell Technology Group Ltd.	259.92%	-26.36%	99.58%	60.08%	-43.46%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDA.NEO and MRVL is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2022	0.61

Over the past year, the correlation between NVDA.NEO and MRVL has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap NVDA.NEO : CA$1.17T MRVL : $269.46B
EPS NVDA.NEO : CA$4.08 MRVL : $2.90
PE Ratio NVDA.NEO : 11.83 MRVL : 104.16
PS Ratio NVDA.NEO : 6.27 MRVL : 30.19
PB Ratio NVDA.NEO : 9.87 MRVL : 14.79
Total Revenue (TTM) NVDA.NEO : CA$187.14B MRVL : $8.72B
Gross Profit (TTM) NVDA.NEO : CA$131.09B MRVL : $4.41B

Return for Risk

NVDA.NEO vs. MRVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDA.NEO

NVDA.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 77
NVDA.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
NVDA.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
NVDA.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 73
NVDA.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
NVDA.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 77

MRVL

MRVL Risk / Return Rank: 98
MRVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
MRVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
MRVL Omega Ratio Rank: 97
MRVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
MRVL Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDA.NEO vs. MRVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVIDIA Corporation CDR (NVDA.NEO) and Marvell Technology Group Ltd. (MRVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NVDA.NEO	MRVL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.47	5.92	-4.45
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	5.13	-3.02
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.68	-0.43
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.31	14.14	-11.83
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.57	33.05	-27.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NVDA.NEO vs. MRVL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDA.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the MRVL Sharpe Ratio of 5.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDA.NEO and MRVL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NVDA.NEO	MRVL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.47	5.92	-4.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.82	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.85	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.19	0.54	+0.65

Drawdowns

NVDA.NEO vs. MRVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDA.NEO drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, smaller than the maximum MRVL drawdown of -68.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDA.NEO and MRVL.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVDA.NEO	MRVL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.15%	-68.02%	+6.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.04%	-27.89%	+6.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-37.49%	-62.26%	+24.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-62.26%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-62.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.99%	0.00%	-8.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.60%	-24.17%	+8.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.70%	11.91%	-3.21%

Volatility

NVDA.NEO vs. MRVL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NVIDIA Corporation CDR (NVDA.NEO) is 12.54%, while Marvell Technology Group Ltd. (MRVL) has a volatility of 32.99%. This indicates that NVDA.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRVL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVDA.NEO	MRVL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.54%	32.99%	-20.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.04%	49.98%	-24.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.10%	66.59%	-33.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.12%	59.59%	-8.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.12%	50.16%	+0.96%

Dividends

NVDA.NEO vs. MRVL - Dividend Comparison

NVDA.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than MRVL's 0.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MRVL Marvell Technology Group Ltd.	0.08%	0.28%	0.22%	0.40%	0.65%	0.21%	0.50%	0.90%	1.48%	1.12%	1.73%	2.72%
NVDA.NEO NVIDIA Corporation CDR	0.03%	0.03%	0.03%	0.04%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

NVDA.NEO vs. MRVL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between NVIDIA Corporation CDR and Marvell Technology Group Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

NVDA.NEO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation CDR reported a gross profit of 41.85B and revenue of 57.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.4%.

MRVL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology Group Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.26B and revenue of 2.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.2%.

NVDA.NEO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation CDR reported an operating income of 36.01B and revenue of 57.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 63.2%.

MRVL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology Group Ltd. reported an operating income of 339.40M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.

NVDA.NEO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation CDR reported a net income of 31.91B and revenue of 57.01B, resulting in a net margin of 56.0%.

MRVL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology Group Ltd. reported a net income of 34.50M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVDA.NEO and MRVL in my portfolio?

NVDA.NEO and MRVL have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.