NVDA.NEO vs. MRVL
NVDA.NEO (NVIDIA Corporation CDR) and MRVL (Marvell Technology, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Semiconductors industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 3 years, NVDA.NEO returned 62.65%/yr vs 48.91%/yr for MRVL. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
NVDA.NEO vs. MRVL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
NVDA.NEO is traded in CAD, while MRVL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MRVL values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVDA.NEO achieves a 7.58% return, which is significantly lower than MRVL's 135.17% return.
NVDA.NEO
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -3.15%
- 6M
- 10.04%
- YTD
- 7.58%
- 1Y
- 15.06%
- 3Y*
- 62.65%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 58.71%
MRVL
- 1D
- 3.19%
- 1M
- -37.58%
- 6M
- 144.74%
- YTD
- 135.17%
- 1Y
- 167.09%
- 3Y*
- 48.91%
- 5Y*
- 30.37%
- 10Y*
- 34.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.84%
NVDA.NEO vs. MRVL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDA.NEO NVIDIA Corporation CDR | 7.58% | 34.85% | 167.19% | 233.73% | -38.80% |
MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc. | 135.17% | -26.34% | 99.35% | 59.79% | -40.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDA.NEO and MRVL is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2022 | 0.62 |
Over the past year, the correlation between NVDA.NEO and MRVL has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
NVDA.NEO:
CA$6.44T
MRVL:
$170.72B
NVDA.NEO:
$4.08
MRVL:
$2.90
NVDA.NEO:
7.96
MRVL:
67.31
NVDA.NEO:
4.22
MRVL:
19.51
NVDA.NEO:
6.64
MRVL:
9.56
NVDA.NEO:
$187.14B
MRVL:
$8.72B
NVDA.NEO:
$131.09B
MRVL:
$4.41B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVDA.NEO vs. MRVL — Risk / Return Rank
NVDA.NEO
MRVL
NVDA.NEO vs. MRVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVIDIA Corporation CDR (NVDA.NEO) and Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NVDA.NEO | MRVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.36 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.71 | 4.22 | -3.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.51 | 12.28 | -10.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NVDA.NEO vs. MRVL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDA.NEO drawdown since its inception was -61.08%, smaller than the maximum MRVL drawdown of -84.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDA.NEO and MRVL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDA.NEO | MRVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.08% | -84.76% | +23.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.19% | -39.86% | +18.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.49% | -61.64% | +24.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -61.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.09% | -37.82% | +23.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.27% | -39.91% | +24.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.00% | 13.67% | -3.67% |
Volatility
NVDA.NEO vs. MRVL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NVIDIA Corporation CDR (NVDA.NEO) is 10.02%, while Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) has a volatility of 27.10%. This indicates that NVDA.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRVL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVDA.NEO | MRVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.02% | 27.10% | -17.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.04% | 63.28% | -36.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.76% | 76.61% | -41.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.57% | 64.03% | -12.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.57% | 53.37% | -1.80% |
Dividends
NVDA.NEO vs. MRVL - Dividend Comparison
NVDA.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, more than MRVL's 0.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc. | 0.12% | 0.28% | 0.22% | 0.40% | 0.65% | 0.21% | 0.50% | 0.90% | 1.48% | 1.12% | 1.73% | 2.72% |
NVDA.NEO NVIDIA Corporation CDR | 0.14% | 0.02% | 0.06% | 0.13% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
NVDA.NEO vs. MRVL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NVIDIA Corporation CDR and Marvell Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NVDA.NEO vs. MRVL - Profitability Comparison
NVDA.NEO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NVIDIA Corporation CDR reported a gross profit of 41.85B and revenue of 57.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.4%.
MRVL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.26B and revenue of 2.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.2%.
NVDA.NEO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NVIDIA Corporation CDR reported an operating income of 36.01B and revenue of 57.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 63.2%.
MRVL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 339.40M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.
NVDA.NEO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NVIDIA Corporation CDR reported a net income of 31.91B and revenue of 57.01B, resulting in a net margin of 56.0%.
MRVL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 34.50M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NVDA.NEO and MRVL have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for NVDA.NEO and MRVL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer