NUW vs. FHMIX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

NUW (Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Value Fund) and FHMIX (Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, NUW returned 0.37%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for FHMIX. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

NUW vs. FHMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Value Fund (NUW) and Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund (FHMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUW achieves a 1.77% return, which is significantly higher than FHMIX's 1.11% return.

NUW

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 2.64%
• YTD: 1.77%
• 6M: 1.48%
• 1Y: 9.08%
• 3Y*: 5.63%
• 5Y*: 0.37%
• 10Y*: 1.26%

FHMIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.21%
• YTD: 1.11%
• 6M: 1.37%
• 1Y: 2.85%
• 3Y*: 1.90%
• 5Y*: 1.14%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUW vs. FHMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
NUW Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Value Fund	1.77%	9.90%	3.51%	3.79%	-15.19%	1.25%
FHMIX Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund	1.11%	3.09%	1.19%	0.32%	0.00%	0.02%

Correlation

The correlation between NUW and FHMIX is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2021	0.09

Return for Risk

NUW vs. FHMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUW

NUW Risk / Return Rank: 24
NUW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
NUW Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
NUW Omega Ratio Rank: 21
NUW Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
NUW Martin Ratio Rank: 26

FHMIX

FHMIX Risk / Return Rank: 99
FHMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
FHMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
FHMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 100
FHMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
FHMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUW vs. FHMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Value Fund (NUW) and Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund (FHMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NUW	FHMIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.19	3.19	-2.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.86	11.49	-9.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	5.69	-4.46
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.86	28.50	-26.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.81	77.58	-71.77

NUW vs. FHMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUW Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the FHMIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUW and FHMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NUW vs. FHMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUW drawdown since its inception was -26.43%, which is greater than FHMIX's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUW and FHMIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NUW	FHMIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.43%	-0.50%	-25.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.89%	-0.10%	-4.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.19%	-0.50%	-9.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.58%	-0.50%	-22.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.43%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.73%	0.00%	-1.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.09%	-0.06%	-8.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.57%	0.04%	+1.53%

Volatility

NUW vs. FHMIX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Value Fund (NUW) has a higher volatility of 2.40% compared to Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund (FHMIX) at 0.21%. This indicates that NUW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NUW	FHMIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.40%	0.21%	+2.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.24%	0.56%	+5.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.70%	0.89%	+6.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.62%	0.79%	+9.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.11%	0.78%	+11.33%

Dividends

NUW vs. FHMIX - Dividend Comparison

NUW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.08%, more than FHMIX's 2.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHMIX Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund	2.80%	3.04%	1.18%	0.32%	0.00%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NUW Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Value Fund	4.08%	4.07%	3.89%	3.58%	3.44%	3.98%	2.85%	3.87%	5.34%	5.33%	4.72%	4.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NUW and FHMIX in my portfolio?

NUW and FHMIX have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NUW or FHMIX?

NUW has higher volatility (2.40%) compared to FHMIX (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUW dropped -26.43% vs FHMIX's -0.50%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FHMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.