PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUVBX vs. USMSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUVBX vs. USMSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Intermediate Duration Municipal Bond Fund (NUVBX) and JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Fund (USMSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUVBX achieves a 0.91% return, which is significantly higher than USMSX's 0.72% return.


NUVBX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.39%
YTD
0.91%
6M
1.31%
1Y
5.67%
3Y*
3.89%
5Y*
1.17%
10Y*
2.32%

USMSX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.29%
YTD
0.72%
6M
1.03%
1Y
2.55%
3Y*
2.97%
5Y*
1.75%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUVBX vs. USMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUVBX
Nuveen Intermediate Duration Municipal Bond Fund
0.91%4.83%1.98%5.89%-7.92%1.99%4.47%7.44%1.63%6.26%
USMSX
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Fund
0.72%2.87%3.09%3.21%-0.90%-0.15%0.77%1.90%1.01%0.69%

Correlation

The correlation between NUVBX and USMSX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.33

The correlation between NUVBX and USMSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUVBX vs. USMSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUVBX
NUVBX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
NUVBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUVBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUVBX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
NUVBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUVBX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

USMSX
USMSX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
USMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
USMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
USMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
USMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUVBX vs. USMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Intermediate Duration Municipal Bond Fund (NUVBX) and JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Fund (USMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUVBXUSMSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

4.93

-3.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

8.59

-6.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.09

46.38

-40.29

NUVBX vs. USMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUVBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is lower than the USMSX Sharpe Ratio of 4.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUVBX and USMSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUVBXUSMSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

4.27

-1.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

2.49

-2.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

1.90

-1.13

Drawdowns

NUVBX vs. USMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUVBX drawdown since its inception was -31.28%, which is greater than USMSX's maximum drawdown of -2.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUVBX and USMSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUVBXUSMSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.28%

-2.09%

-29.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.87%

-0.30%

-2.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.56%

-0.50%

-4.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.03%

-2.03%

-10.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.10%

0.00%

-1.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.52%

-0.22%

-3.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

0.06%

+0.89%

Volatility

NUVBX vs. USMSX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Intermediate Duration Municipal Bond Fund (NUVBX) has a higher volatility of 0.99% compared to JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Fund (USMSX) at 0.22%. This indicates that NUVBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUVBXUSMSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.99%

0.22%

+0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.87%

0.45%

+1.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41%

0.60%

+1.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.44%

0.70%

+2.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.59%

0.73%

+2.86%

NUVBX vs. USMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUVBX has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than USMSX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUVBX vs. USMSX - Dividend Comparison

NUVBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, more than USMSX's 2.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NUVBX
Nuveen Intermediate Duration Municipal Bond Fund
3.11%3.31%3.22%2.81%2.60%2.18%2.55%3.06%3.02%2.97%3.15%2.97%
USMSX
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Fund
2.33%2.42%2.84%2.35%0.70%0.05%0.57%1.28%1.01%0.59%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUVBX and USMSX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NUVBX has higher volatility (0.99%) compared to USMSX (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUVBX dropped -31.28% vs USMSX's -2.09%.

USMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.27 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUVBX and USMSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer