PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUVBX vs. NPV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUVBX vs. NPV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Intermediate Duration Municipal Bond Fund (NUVBX) and Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund (NPV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUVBX achieves a 0.91% return, which is significantly lower than NPV's 7.07% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NUVBX having a 2.32% annualized return and NPV not far behind at 2.29%.


NUVBX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.39%
YTD
0.91%
6M
1.31%
1Y
5.67%
3Y*
3.89%
5Y*
1.17%
10Y*
2.32%

NPV

1D
0.17%
1M
0.75%
YTD
7.07%
6M
5.59%
1Y
10.86%
3Y*
8.26%
5Y*
-1.46%
10Y*
2.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUVBX vs. NPV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUVBX
Nuveen Intermediate Duration Municipal Bond Fund
0.91%4.83%1.98%5.89%-7.92%1.99%4.47%7.44%1.63%6.26%
NPV
Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund
7.07%-5.91%24.61%0.42%-31.53%10.93%13.15%29.60%-4.42%3.20%

Correlation

The correlation between NUVBX and NPV is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 1994

0.19

The correlation between NUVBX and NPV shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (all time) to 0.40 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUVBX vs. NPV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUVBX
NUVBX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
NUVBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUVBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUVBX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
NUVBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUVBX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

NPV
NPV Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
NPV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NPV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
NPV Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
NPV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
NPV Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUVBX vs. NPV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Intermediate Duration Municipal Bond Fund (NUVBX) and Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund (NPV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUVBXNPVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.29

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

2.53

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.09

6.38

-0.29

NUVBX vs. NPV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUVBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is higher than the NPV Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUVBX and NPV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUVBXNPVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

1.57

+0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

-0.11

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.17

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.29

+0.49

Drawdowns

NUVBX vs. NPV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUVBX drawdown since its inception was -31.28%, smaller than the maximum NPV drawdown of -44.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUVBX and NPV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUVBXNPVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.28%

-44.25%

+12.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.87%

-4.31%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.56%

-18.29%

+13.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.03%

-44.25%

+32.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.03%

-44.25%

+32.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.10%

-15.57%

+14.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.52%

-10.18%

+6.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

1.71%

-0.76%

Volatility

NUVBX vs. NPV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Intermediate Duration Municipal Bond Fund (NUVBX) is 0.99%, while Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund (NPV) has a volatility of 1.83%. This indicates that NUVBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NPV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUVBXNPVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.99%

1.83%

-0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.87%

5.04%

-3.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41%

6.93%

-4.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.44%

13.48%

-10.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.59%

13.19%

-9.60%

NUVBX vs. NPV - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUVBX has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than NPV's 1.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUVBX vs. NPV - Dividend Comparison

NUVBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, less than NPV's 6.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NPV
Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund
6.95%7.55%5.63%3.89%5.08%3.42%3.49%3.58%4.62%4.40%4.87%5.25%
NUVBX
Nuveen Intermediate Duration Municipal Bond Fund
3.11%3.31%3.22%2.81%2.60%2.18%2.55%3.06%3.02%2.97%3.15%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUVBX and NPV have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NPV has higher volatility (1.83%) compared to NUVBX (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUVBX dropped -31.28% vs NPV's -44.25%.

NUVBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUVBX and NPV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer