NUSIX vs. HUBBX
NUSIX (Navigator Ultra Short Term Bond Fund) and HUBBX (Hartford Ultrashort Bond HLS Fund) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, NUSIX returned 3.68%/yr vs 2.84%/yr for HUBBX. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NUSIX charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for HUBBX.
Performance
NUSIX vs. HUBBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUSIX achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly higher than HUBBX's 0.97% return.
NUSIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 1.56%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- 1Y
- 4.27%
- 3Y*
- 5.04%
- 5Y*
- 3.68%
- 10Y*
- —
HUBBX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 0.97%
- 6M
- 1.26%
- 1Y
- 3.53%
- 3Y*
- 4.52%
- 5Y*
- 2.84%
- 10Y*
- 2.02%
NUSIX vs. HUBBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUSIX Navigator Ultra Short Term Bond Fund | 1.56% | 4.63% | 5.54% | 5.64% | 1.14% | 0.36% | 1.49% | 1.60% |
HUBBX Hartford Ultrashort Bond HLS Fund | 0.97% | 4.32% | 4.91% | 4.98% | -0.50% | -0.46% | 1.27% | 1.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUSIX and HUBBX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2019 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUSIX vs. HUBBX — Risk / Return Rank
NUSIX
HUBBX
NUSIX vs. HUBBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Navigator Ultra Short Term Bond Fund (NUSIX) and Hartford Ultrashort Bond HLS Fund (HUBBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NUSIX | HUBBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +20.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 18.90 | 2.81 | +16.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 43.25 | 12.29 | +30.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 337.91 | 60.34 | +277.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NUSIX | HUBBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.91 | 4.32 | +2.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 4.83 | 3.21 | +1.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 2.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.74 | 2.17 | +1.56 |
Drawdowns
NUSIX vs. HUBBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUSIX drawdown since its inception was -2.69%, which is greater than HUBBX's maximum drawdown of -2.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUSIX and HUBBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUSIX | HUBBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.69% | -2.53% | -0.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.10% | -0.29% | +0.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.10% | -0.29% | +0.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.80% | -1.76% | +0.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -2.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.08% | -0.20% | +0.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 0.06% | -0.05% |
Volatility
NUSIX vs. HUBBX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Navigator Ultra Short Term Bond Fund (NUSIX) is 0.18%, while Hartford Ultrashort Bond HLS Fund (HUBBX) has a volatility of 0.24%. This indicates that NUSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HUBBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUSIX | HUBBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.18% | 0.24% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.43% | 0.62% | -0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63% | 0.82% | -0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.77% | 0.89% | -0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.83% | 0.80% | +0.03% |
NUSIX vs. HUBBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUSIX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than HUBBX's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
NUSIX vs. HUBBX - Dividend Comparison
NUSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, less than HUBBX's 4.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUBBX Hartford Ultrashort Bond HLS Fund | 4.90% | 4.95% | 4.14% | 1.00% | 0.00% | 0.54% | 2.17% | 1.63% | 0.86% | 0.50% | 0.14% |
NUSIX Navigator Ultra Short Term Bond Fund | 4.16% | 4.25% | 5.23% | 4.92% | 1.74% | 0.66% | 1.08% | 1.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NUSIX and HUBBX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HUBBX has higher volatility (0.24%) compared to NUSIX (0.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUSIX dropped -2.69% vs HUBBX's -2.53%.
NUSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.91 vs 4.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NUSIX and HUBBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer