PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUSIX vs. GIYIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUSIX vs. GIYIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Navigator Ultra Short Term Bond Fund (NUSIX) and Guggenheim Ultra Short Duration Fund (GIYIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NUSIX having a 1.56% return and GIYIX slightly higher at 1.63%.


NUSIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.56%
6M
1.88%
1Y
4.27%
3Y*
5.04%
5Y*
3.68%
10Y*

GIYIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.37%
YTD
1.63%
6M
2.03%
1Y
4.67%
3Y*
6.04%
5Y*
3.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUSIX vs. GIYIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
NUSIX
Navigator Ultra Short Term Bond Fund
1.56%4.63%5.54%5.64%1.14%0.36%1.49%1.60%
GIYIX
Guggenheim Ultra Short Duration Fund
1.63%5.20%7.04%6.81%-1.19%0.17%1.78%1.52%

Correlation

The correlation between NUSIX and GIYIX is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2019

0.16

The correlation between NUSIX and GIYIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (3 years) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUSIX vs. GIYIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUSIX
NUSIX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
NUSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
NUSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

GIYIX
GIYIX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
GIYIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIYIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIYIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
GIYIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIYIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUSIX vs. GIYIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Navigator Ultra Short Term Bond Fund (NUSIX) and Guggenheim Ultra Short Duration Fund (GIYIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUSIXGIYIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

6.91

3.29

+3.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

29.02

9.86

+19.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

18.90

3.09

+15.80

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

43.25

11.87

+31.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

337.91

57.72

+280.18

NUSIX vs. GIYIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUSIX Sharpe Ratio is 6.91, which is higher than the GIYIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUSIX and GIYIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUSIXGIYIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.91

3.29

+3.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

4.83

2.54

+2.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.74

2.22

+1.52

Drawdowns

NUSIX vs. GIYIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUSIX drawdown since its inception was -2.69%, smaller than the maximum GIYIX drawdown of -3.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUSIX and GIYIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUSIXGIYIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.69%

-3.50%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.10%

-0.40%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.10%

-0.40%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.80%

-3.15%

+2.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.08%

-0.35%

+0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

0.08%

-0.07%

Volatility

NUSIX vs. GIYIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Navigator Ultra Short Term Bond Fund (NUSIX) is 0.18%, while Guggenheim Ultra Short Duration Fund (GIYIX) has a volatility of 0.45%. This indicates that NUSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GIYIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUSIXGIYIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.18%

0.45%

-0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.43%

1.00%

-0.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63%

1.43%

-0.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.77%

1.52%

-0.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.83%

1.43%

-0.60%

NUSIX vs. GIYIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUSIX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than GIYIX's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUSIX vs. GIYIX - Dividend Comparison

NUSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, less than GIYIX's 4.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
GIYIX
Guggenheim Ultra Short Duration Fund
4.36%4.35%5.15%4.38%1.67%0.78%1.45%2.52%0.56%
NUSIX
Navigator Ultra Short Term Bond Fund
4.16%4.25%5.23%4.92%1.74%0.66%1.08%1.99%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUSIX and GIYIX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GIYIX has higher volatility (0.45%) compared to NUSIX (0.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUSIX dropped -2.69% vs GIYIX's -3.50%.

NUSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.91 vs 3.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUSIX and GIYIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer