NUSIX vs. CUSDX
NUSIX (Navigator Ultra Short Term Bond Fund) and CUSDX (Six Circles Ultra Short Duration Fund) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, NUSIX returned 3.68%/yr vs 3.01%/yr for CUSDX. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NUSIX charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for CUSDX.
Performance
NUSIX vs. CUSDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUSIX achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly higher than CUSDX's 1.42% return.
NUSIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.56%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- 1Y
- 4.27%
- 3Y*
- 5.04%
- 5Y*
- 3.68%
- 10Y*
- —
CUSDX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.42%
- 6M
- 1.78%
- 1Y
- 4.33%
- 3Y*
- 4.77%
- 5Y*
- 3.01%
- 10Y*
- —
NUSIX vs. CUSDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUSIX Navigator Ultra Short Term Bond Fund | 1.56% | 4.63% | 5.54% | 5.64% | 1.14% | 0.36% | 1.49% | 1.60% |
CUSDX Six Circles Ultra Short Duration Fund | 1.42% | 3.64% | 5.96% | 5.13% | -0.64% | 0.04% | 2.06% | 0.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUSIX and CUSDX is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2019 | 0.15 |
The correlation between NUSIX and CUSDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUSIX vs. CUSDX — Risk / Return Rank
NUSIX
CUSDX
NUSIX vs. CUSDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Navigator Ultra Short Term Bond Fund (NUSIX) and Six Circles Ultra Short Duration Fund (CUSDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NUSIX | CUSDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +20.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 18.90 | 4.02 | +14.88 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 43.25 | 10.98 | +32.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 337.91 | 57.60 | +280.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NUSIX | CUSDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.91 | 4.80 | +2.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 4.83 | 2.98 | +1.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.74 | 2.39 | +1.34 |
Drawdowns
NUSIX vs. CUSDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUSIX drawdown since its inception was -2.69%, which is greater than CUSDX's maximum drawdown of -1.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUSIX and CUSDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUSIX | CUSDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.69% | -1.99% | -0.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.10% | -0.40% | +0.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.10% | -0.80% | +0.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.80% | -1.99% | +1.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.08% | -0.25% | +0.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 0.08% | -0.07% |
Volatility
NUSIX vs. CUSDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Navigator Ultra Short Term Bond Fund (NUSIX) is 0.18%, while Six Circles Ultra Short Duration Fund (CUSDX) has a volatility of 0.23%. This indicates that NUSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CUSDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUSIX | CUSDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.18% | 0.23% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.43% | 0.54% | -0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62% | 0.91% | -0.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.77% | 1.02% | -0.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.83% | 0.95% | -0.12% |
NUSIX vs. CUSDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUSIX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than CUSDX's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
NUSIX vs. CUSDX - Dividend Comparison
NUSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, which matches CUSDX's 4.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CUSDX Six Circles Ultra Short Duration Fund | 4.15% | 3.28% | 4.76% | 3.25% | 1.70% | 0.84% | 1.63% | 0.67% |
NUSIX Navigator Ultra Short Term Bond Fund | 4.16% | 4.25% | 5.23% | 4.92% | 1.74% | 0.66% | 1.08% | 1.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NUSIX and CUSDX have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CUSDX has higher volatility (0.23%) compared to NUSIX (0.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUSIX dropped -2.69% vs CUSDX's -1.99%.
NUSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.91 vs 4.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NUSIX and CUSDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer