PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUSB vs. NUSC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUSB vs. NUSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Ultra Short Income ETF (NUSB) and Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF (NUSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUSB achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly lower than NUSC's 12.88% return.


NUSB

1D
0.00%
1M
0.32%
YTD
1.52%
6M
1.88%
1Y
4.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NUSC

1D
-0.57%
1M
3.77%
YTD
12.88%
6M
12.74%
1Y
27.41%
3Y*
13.27%
5Y*
4.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUSB vs. NUSC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NUSB
Nuveen Ultra Short Income ETF
1.52%4.71%4.50%
NUSC
Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF
12.88%7.72%5.44%

Correlation

The correlation between NUSB and NUSC is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUSB vs. NUSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUSB
NUSB Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
NUSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUSB Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
NUSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUSB Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

NUSC
NUSC Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
NUSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUSC Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
NUSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUSC Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUSB vs. NUSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Ultra Short Income ETF (NUSB) and Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF (NUSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUSBNUSCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+10.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+30.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

9.19

1.28

+7.91

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

72.98

2.72

+70.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

397.82

9.81

+388.01

NUSB vs. NUSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUSB Sharpe Ratio is 11.80, which is higher than the NUSC Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUSB and NUSC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUSBNUSCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.80

1.61

+10.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

12.54

0.44

+12.10

Drawdowns

NUSB vs. NUSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUSB drawdown since its inception was -0.16%, smaller than the maximum NUSC drawdown of -41.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUSB and NUSC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUSBNUSCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.16%

-41.49%

+41.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.06%

-10.10%

+10.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.57%

+0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.00%

-8.21%

+8.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

2.80%

-2.79%

Volatility

NUSB vs. NUSC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Ultra Short Income ETF (NUSB) is 0.09%, while Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF (NUSC) has a volatility of 4.50%. This indicates that NUSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUSBNUSCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.09%

4.50%

-4.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.23%

12.17%

-11.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37%

17.11%

-16.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.39%

21.15%

-20.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.39%

22.36%

-21.97%

NUSB vs. NUSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUSB has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than NUSC's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUSB vs. NUSC - Dividend Comparison

NUSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, more than NUSC's 0.93% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUSB
Nuveen Ultra Short Income ETF
4.30%4.51%3.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NUSC
Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF
0.93%1.05%1.15%1.11%1.16%7.06%0.52%0.90%3.95%0.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUSB and NUSC have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NUSC has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to NUSB (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUSB dropped -0.16% vs NUSC's -41.49%.

On 1-year performance, NUSC leads with 27.41% vs 4.32% for NUSB. On fees, NUSB is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, NUSB has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NUSC has performed better with a 27.41% return vs 4.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NUSB is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for NUSC.

NUSB has the higher dividend yield at 4.30%, compared with 0.93% for NUSC.

NUSB is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while NUSC is Small Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for NUSB and 0.30% for NUSC.

NUSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.80 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUSB and NUSC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer