PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUSB vs. BOXX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NUSB vs. BOXX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Ultra Short Income ETF (NUSB) and Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NUSB vs. BOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NUSB
Nuveen Ultra Short Income ETF
0.83%4.71%4.50%
BOXX
Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF
1.03%4.37%4.22%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUSB achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly lower than BOXX's 1.03% return.


NUSB

1D
0.06%
1M
0.15%
YTD
0.83%
6M
1.94%
1Y
4.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BOXX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.03%
6M
2.13%
1Y
4.31%
3Y*
4.83%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NUSB vs. BOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUSB has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than BOXX's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

NUSB vs. BOXX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUSB
NUSB Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
NUSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUSB Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
NUSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUSB Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

BOXX
BOXX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BOXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOXX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BOXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOXX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUSB vs. BOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Ultra Short Income ETF (NUSB) and Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUSBBOXXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

10.42

13.56

-3.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

26.35

47.23

-20.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

6.58

10.69

-4.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

27.86

120.87

-93.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

203.13

720.99

-517.85

NUSB vs. BOXX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUSB Sharpe Ratio is 10.42, which is comparable to the BOXX Sharpe Ratio of 13.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUSB and BOXX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUSBBOXXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.42

13.56

-3.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

12.47

13.15

-0.68

Correlation

The correlation between NUSB and BOXX is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

NUSB vs. BOXX - Dividend Comparison

NUSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, while BOXX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024
NUSB
Nuveen Ultra Short Income ETF
4.42%4.51%3.61%
BOXX
Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF
0.00%0.00%0.26%

Drawdowns

NUSB vs. BOXX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUSB drawdown since its inception was -0.16%, which is greater than BOXX's maximum drawdown of -0.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUSB and BOXX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NUSBBOXXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.16%

-0.12%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.16%

-0.04%

-0.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.02%

0.01%

+0.01%

Volatility

NUSB vs. BOXX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Ultra Short Income ETF (NUSB) and Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) have volatilities of 0.13% and 0.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NUSBBOXXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.13%

0.13%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.23%

0.24%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42%

0.32%

+0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.39%

0.37%

+0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.39%

0.37%

+0.02%