NURE vs. NSCR

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

NURE (Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF) and NSCR (Nuveen Sustainable Core ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NURE is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Short-Term REIT Index, while NSCR is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Nuveen. NURE is passively managed, while NSCR is actively managed. Over the past year, NURE returned 10.17% vs 7.08% for NSCR. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NURE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for NSCR.

Performance

NURE vs. NSCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE) and Nuveen Sustainable Core ETF (NSCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NURE achieves a 13.59% return, which is significantly higher than NSCR's -6.24% return.

NURE

• 1D: 2.34%
• 1M: 5.22%
• YTD: 13.59%
• 6M: 16.03%
• 1Y: 10.17%
• 3Y*: 5.79%
• 5Y*: 2.02%
• 10Y*: —

NSCR

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: -6.24%
• 6M: -5.95%
• 1Y: 7.08%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NURE vs. NSCR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NURE Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF	13.59%	-7.51%	8.10%
NSCR Nuveen Sustainable Core ETF	-6.24%	13.32%	12.92%

Correlation

The correlation between NURE and NSCR is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024	0.37

The correlation between NURE and NSCR shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NURE vs. NSCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NURE	NSCR
Real Estate	100.0%	1.3%
Basic Materials	-	1.4%
Communication Services	-	9.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	12.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.0%
Energy	-	4.3%
Financial Services	-	19.6%
Healthcare	-	10.5%
Industrials	-	5.6%
Technology	-	28.8%
Utilities	-	3.8%

Return for Risk

NURE vs. NSCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NURE

NURE Risk / Return Rank: 21
NURE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
NURE Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
NURE Omega Ratio Rank: 19
NURE Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
NURE Martin Ratio Rank: 20

NSCR

NSCR Risk / Return Rank: 18
NSCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
NSCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
NSCR Omega Ratio Rank: 20
NSCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
NSCR Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NURE vs. NSCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE) and Nuveen Sustainable Core ETF (NSCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NURE	NSCR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.64	0.60	+0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.03	0.91	+0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.12	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.12	0.60	+0.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.32	1.64	+0.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NURE vs. NSCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NURE Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is comparable to the NSCR Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NURE and NSCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NURE	NSCR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64	0.60	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	0.53	-0.25

Drawdowns

NURE vs. NSCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NURE drawdown since its inception was -46.05%, which is greater than NSCR's maximum drawdown of -20.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NURE and NSCR.

Drawdown Indicators

	NURE	NSCR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.05%	-20.75%	-25.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.13%	-11.81%	+2.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.03%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.98%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.45%	-7.98%	-2.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.30%	-3.34%	-8.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.39%	4.32%	+0.07%

Volatility

NURE vs. NSCR - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE) has a higher volatility of 4.58% compared to Nuveen Sustainable Core ETF (NSCR) at 0.00%. This indicates that NURE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NSCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NURE	NSCR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.58%	0.00%	+4.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.65%	8.25%	+3.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.95%	11.80%	+4.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.67%	15.96%	+3.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.81%	15.96%	+5.85%

NURE vs. NSCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

NURE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than NSCR's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

NURE vs. NSCR - Dividend Comparison

NURE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, less than NSCR's 16.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
NSCR Nuveen Sustainable Core ETF	16.34%	1.92%	1.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NURE Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF	4.38%	4.56%	3.51%	3.73%	2.80%	1.34%	3.41%	3.28%	4.11%	3.86%	0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NURE and NSCR in my portfolio?

NURE and NSCR have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NURE or NSCR?

NURE has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to NSCR (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NURE dropped -46.05% vs NSCR's -20.75%.

Which ETF is better, NURE or NSCR?

On 1-year performance, NURE leads with 10.17% vs 7.08% for NSCR. On fees, NURE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NSCR has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NURE or NSCR?

Over the 1-year period, NURE has performed better with a 10.17% return vs 7.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NURE or NSCR?

NURE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for NSCR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NURE or NSCR?

NSCR has the higher dividend yield at 16.34%, compared with 4.38% for NURE.

What is the main difference between NURE and NSCR?

NURE is categorized as REIT, while NSCR is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NURE and 0.45% for NSCR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NURE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.