NUKL.DE vs. QDVF.DE
NUKL.DE (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A) and QDVF.DE (iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Energy Equities funds - NUKL.DE tracks the MarketVector Global Uranium and Nuclear Energy Infrastructure while QDVF.DE tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, NUKL.DE returned 41.91%/yr vs 13.74%/yr for QDVF.DE. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NUKL.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QDVF.DE.
Performance
NUKL.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUKL.DE achieves a 11.67% return, which is significantly lower than QDVF.DE's 32.71% return.
NUKL.DE
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- -1.33%
- YTD
- 11.67%
- 6M
- 4.20%
- 1Y
- 50.82%
- 3Y*
- 41.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDVF.DE
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- YTD
- 32.71%
- 6M
- 29.55%
- 1Y
- 43.90%
- 3Y*
- 13.74%
- 5Y*
- 21.44%
- 10Y*
- 8.97%
NUKL.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NUKL.DE VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A | 11.67% | 51.50% | 38.03% | 24.46% |
QDVF.DE iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | 32.71% | -2.67% | 9.20% | -4.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUKL.DE and QDVF.DE is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2023 | 0.18 |
The correlation between NUKL.DE and QDVF.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUKL.DE vs. QDVF.DE — Risk / Return Rank
NUKL.DE
QDVF.DE
NUKL.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A (NUKL.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NUKL.DE | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.32 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 2.54 | -0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.43 | 7.98 | -3.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NUKL.DE | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21 | 1.82 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 0.28 | +0.82 |
Drawdowns
NUKL.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUKL.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.52%, smaller than the maximum QDVF.DE drawdown of -65.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUKL.DE and QDVF.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUKL.DE | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.52% | -65.81% | +28.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.12% | -17.23% | -9.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.52% | -27.13% | -10.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -65.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.83% | -8.92% | -3.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.79% | -17.41% | +9.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.43% | 5.49% | +5.94% |
Volatility
NUKL.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A (NUKL.DE) has a higher volatility of 11.05% compared to iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE) at 7.70%. This indicates that NUKL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDVF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUKL.DE | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.05% | 7.70% | +3.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.97% | 20.43% | +8.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.82% | 24.05% | +17.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.24% | 26.95% | +7.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.24% | 28.68% | +5.56% |
NUKL.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUKL.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVF.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
NUKL.DE vs. QDVF.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither NUKL.DE nor QDVF.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NUKL.DE and QDVF.DE have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDVF.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDVF.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for NUKL.DE.
NUKL.DE tracks MarketVector Global Uranium and Nuclear Energy Infrastructure, while QDVF.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for NUKL.DE and 0.15% for QDVF.DE.
Find the right allocation for NUKL.DE and QDVF.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer