NUKL.DE vs. PPFB.DE
NUKL.DE (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A) and PPFB.DE (iShares Physical Gold ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - NUKL.DE is a Uranium fund tracking the MarketVector Global Uranium and Nuclear Energy Infrastructure, while PPFB.DE is a Gold fund tracking the Gold. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, NUKL.DE returned 33.29%/yr vs 25.59%/yr for PPFB.DE. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NUKL.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for PPFB.DE.
Performance
NUKL.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUKL.DE achieves a -8.46% return, which is significantly lower than PPFB.DE's -6.38% return.
NUKL.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -15.49%
- 6M
- -25.07%
- YTD
- -8.46%
- 1Y
- 2.25%
- 3Y*
- 33.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PPFB.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -4.91%
- 6M
- -11.49%
- YTD
- -6.38%
- 1Y
- 21.76%
- 3Y*
- 25.59%
- 5Y*
- 17.85%
- 10Y*
- —
NUKL.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NUKL.DE VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A | -8.46% | 51.50% | 38.03% | 15.17% |
PPFB.DE iShares Physical Gold ETC | -6.38% | 49.11% | 34.17% | 6.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUKL.DE and PPFB.DE is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2023 | 0.24 |
Over the past year, NUKL.DE and PPFB.DE have become more correlated (0.44) than their long-term average of 0.24, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUKL.DE vs. PPFB.DE — Risk / Return Rank
NUKL.DE
PPFB.DE
NUKL.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A (NUKL.DE) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NUKL.DE | PPFB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.18 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | 0.97 | -0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.27 | 2.28 | -2.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NUKL.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUKL.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.52%, which is greater than PPFB.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUKL.DE and PPFB.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUKL.DE | PPFB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.52% | -22.54% | -14.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.54% | -22.54% | -6.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.52% | -22.54% | -14.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.54% | -22.54% | -6.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.77% | -4.80% | -3.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.55% | 9.58% | +3.97% |
Volatility
NUKL.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A (NUKL.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.21% compared to iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) at 6.29%. This indicates that NUKL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPFB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUKL.DE | PPFB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.21% | 6.29% | +1.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.78% | 21.19% | +7.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.02% | 24.61% | +17.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.53% | 16.46% | +18.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.53% | 16.45% | +18.08% |
NUKL.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUKL.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than PPFB.DE's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
NUKL.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither NUKL.DE nor PPFB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NUKL.DE and PPFB.DE have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PPFB.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PPFB.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for NUKL.DE.
NUKL.DE is categorized as Uranium, while PPFB.DE is Gold. NUKL.DE tracks MarketVector Global Uranium and Nuclear Energy Infrastructure, while PPFB.DE tracks Gold. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for NUKL.DE and 0.12% for PPFB.DE.
Find the right allocation for NUKL.DE and PPFB.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer