NUGY vs. BESF
NUGY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST Gold Miners ETF) and BESF (Bastion Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NUGY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while BESF is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Bastion. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. NUGY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for BESF.
Performance
NUGY vs. BESF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUGY achieves a -7.40% return, which is significantly lower than BESF's 19.15% return.
NUGY
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -4.40%
- 6M
- -13.88%
- YTD
- -7.40%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BESF
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- 6M
- 14.59%
- YTD
- 19.15%
- 1Y
- 53.11%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NUGY vs. BESF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NUGY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Gold Miners ETF | -7.40% | 3.20% |
BESF Bastion Energy ETF | 19.15% | 7.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUGY and BESF is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | -0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUGY vs. BESF — Risk / Return Rank
NUGY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BESF
NUGY vs. BESF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST Gold Miners ETF (NUGY) and Bastion Energy ETF (BESF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NUGY | BESF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.36 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.87 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.78 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NUGY vs. BESF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUGY drawdown since its inception was -19.63%, which is greater than BESF's maximum drawdown of -10.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUGY and BESF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUGY | BESF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.63% | -10.97% | -8.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.63% | -6.35% | -13.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.22% | -3.09% | -6.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.55% | — |
Volatility
NUGY vs. BESF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUGY | BESF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.78% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.68% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.98% | 24.64% | +0.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.98% | 24.13% | +0.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.98% | 24.13% | +0.85% |
NUGY vs. BESF - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUGY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than BESF's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
NUGY vs. BESF - Dividend Comparison
NUGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 91.51%, more than BESF's 5.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BESF Bastion Energy ETF | 5.77% | 6.39% |
NUGY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Gold Miners ETF | 91.51% | 12.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NUGY and BESF have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BESF is cheaper at 0.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BESF is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for NUGY.
NUGY has the higher dividend yield at 91.51%, compared with 5.77% for BESF.
NUGY is categorized as Derivative Income, while BESF is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Bastion. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for NUGY and 0.80% for BESF.
Find the right allocation for NUGY and BESF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer