PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUE vs. LPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NUE vs. LPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nucor Corporation (NUE) and Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUE achieves a 50.67% return, which is significantly higher than LPX's -5.47% return. Over the past 10 years, NUE has outperformed LPX with an annualized return of 20.38%, while LPX has yielded a comparatively lower 17.84% annualized return.


NUE

1D
0.45%
1M
5.57%
YTD
50.67%
6M
50.13%
1Y
100.04%
3Y*
18.49%
5Y*
22.46%
10Y*
20.38%

LPX

1D
-2.35%
1M
7.42%
YTD
-5.47%
6M
-7.40%
1Y
-11.27%
3Y*
5.12%
5Y*
6.85%
10Y*
17.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUE vs. LPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUE
Nucor Corporation
50.67%42.03%-31.95%33.75%17.39%118.45%-1.77%11.84%-16.36%9.60%
LPX
Louisiana-Pacific Corporation
-5.47%-21.05%47.93%21.55%-23.38%113.30%27.96%36.40%-13.75%38.72%

Correlation

The correlation between NUE and LPX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 1983

0.36

The correlation between NUE and LPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (all time) to 0.46 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NUE:

$56.16B

LPX:

$5.30B

EPS

NUE:

$10.12

LPX:

$1.17

PE Ratio

NUE:

24.20

LPX:

64.66

PS Ratio

NUE:

1.65

LPX:

2.07

PB Ratio

NUE:

2.62

LPX:

3.06

Total Revenue (TTM)

NUE:

$34.16B

LPX:

$2.56B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NUE:

$4.77B

LPX:

$507.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

NUE:

$3.49B

LPX:

$247.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUE vs. LPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUE
NUE Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
NUE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUE Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
NUE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUE Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

LPX
LPX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
LPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
LPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
LPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
LPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUE vs. LPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nucor Corporation (NUE) and Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NUELPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

0.99

+0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.46

-0.33

+5.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.28

-0.59

+16.88

NUE vs. LPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUE Sharpe Ratio is 3.43, which is higher than the LPX Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUE and LPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NUE vs. LPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUE drawdown since its inception was -68.34%, smaller than the maximum LPX drawdown of -96.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUE and LPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUELPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.34%

-96.41%

+28.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.43%

-33.83%

+15.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.79%

-43.14%

-4.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.79%

-43.14%

-4.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.21%

-59.45%

+2.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.04%

-35.74%

+27.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.12%

-37.86%

+16.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.17%

19.03%

-12.86%

Volatility

NUE vs. LPX - Volatility Comparison

Nucor Corporation (NUE) and Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX) have volatilities of 9.88% and 10.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUELPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.88%

10.32%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.06%

32.01%

-10.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.41%

41.82%

-12.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.68%

39.95%

-2.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.02%

40.89%

-4.87%

Dividends

NUE vs. LPX - Dividend Comparison

NUE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than LPX's 1.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LPX
Louisiana-Pacific Corporation
1.53%1.39%1.00%1.36%1.49%0.87%1.56%1.82%2.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NUE
Nucor Corporation
0.91%1.35%1.86%1.19%1.52%1.50%3.03%2.85%2.97%2.38%2.52%3.70%

Financials

NUE vs. LPX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nucor Corporation and Louisiana-Pacific Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
9.50B
574.00M
(NUE) Total Revenue
(LPX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NUE vs. LPX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Nucor Corporation and Louisiana-Pacific Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
15.8%
20.0%
Portfolio components
NUE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nucor Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.50B and revenue of 9.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.8%.

LPX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Louisiana-Pacific Corporation reported a gross profit of 115.00M and revenue of 574.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.0%.

NUE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nucor Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 9.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

LPX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Louisiana-Pacific Corporation reported an operating income of 34.00M and revenue of 574.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.9%.

NUE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nucor Corporation reported a net income of 743.00M and revenue of 9.50B, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.

LPX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Louisiana-Pacific Corporation reported a net income of 27.00M and revenue of 574.00M, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NUE and LPX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LPX has higher volatility (10.32%) compared to NUE (9.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUE dropped -68.34% vs LPX's -96.41%.

NUE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.43 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUE and LPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer