NTSX vs. VXUS
NTSX (WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund) and VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NTSX is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while VXUS is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. NTSX is actively managed, while VXUS is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NTSX returned 9.23%/yr vs 8.32%/yr for VXUS. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NTSX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VXUS.
Performance
NTSX vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NTSX achieves a 7.28% return, which is significantly lower than VXUS's 13.69% return.
NTSX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -0.68%
- YTD
- 7.28%
- 6M
- 7.49%
- 1Y
- 23.34%
- 3Y*
- 18.55%
- 5Y*
- 9.23%
- 10Y*
- —
VXUS
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 13.69%
- 6M
- 15.52%
- 1Y
- 30.12%
- 3Y*
- 18.37%
- 5Y*
- 8.32%
- 10Y*
- 10.22%
NTSX vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund | 7.28% | 18.82% | 20.20% | 22.70% | -25.84% | 22.21% | 24.87% | 32.03% | -7.87% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 13.69% | 32.35% | 5.08% | 15.86% | -16.08% | 8.98% | 10.66% | 21.75% | -13.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between NTSX and VXUS is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2018 | 0.74 |
The correlation between NTSX and VXUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
NTSX vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NTSX
VXUS
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
NTSX
VXUS
Communication Services
NTSX
VXUS
Financial Services
NTSX
VXUS
Consumer Cyclical
NTSX
VXUS
Healthcare
NTSX
VXUS
Industrials
NTSX
VXUS
Consumer Defensive
NTSX
VXUS
Energy
NTSX
VXUS
Utilities
NTSX
VXUS
Real Estate
NTSX
VXUS
Basic Materials
NTSX
VXUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NTSX vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank
NTSX
VXUS
NTSX vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NTSX | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.33 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 2.53 | -0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.43 | 9.72 | +0.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NTSX vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTSX drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum VXUS drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSX and VXUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NTSX | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.34% | -35.97% | +4.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.16% | -11.27% | +2.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.82% | -13.58% | -3.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.34% | -29.44% | -1.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.27% | -1.47% | -0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.78% | -8.21% | +1.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 2.93% | -0.80% |
Volatility
NTSX vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) is 5.05%, while Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a volatility of 6.71%. This indicates that NTSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NTSX | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.05% | 6.71% | -1.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.34% | 14.02% | -3.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.92% | 16.09% | -3.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.13% | 16.21% | +0.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.30% | 17.20% | +1.10% |
NTSX vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
NTSX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
NTSX vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison
NTSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than VXUS's 2.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund | 1.09% | 1.14% | 1.14% | 1.21% | 1.36% | 0.82% | 0.92% | 1.42% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 2.67% | 3.18% | 3.37% | 3.24% | 3.09% | 3.10% | 2.14% | 3.06% | 3.18% | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NTSX and VXUS have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VXUS has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to NTSX (5.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTSX dropped -31.34% vs VXUS's -35.97%.
On 5-year performance, NTSX leads with 9.23% vs 8.32% for VXUS. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, NTSX has been the lower-risk option at 5.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NTSX has performed better with a 9.23% return vs 8.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for NTSX.
VXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.67%, compared with 1.09% for NTSX.
NTSX is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while VXUS is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for NTSX and 0.05% for VXUS.
VXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NTSX and VXUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer